Interactive Investor

Edmond Jackson's Stockwatch: Put this pizza chain in your ISA for Tasty returns

1st April 2014 00:00

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Is there space for yet another pizza and pasta, restaurant chain?

The stockmarket appears to reckon so, pushing the AIM-listed shares in Tasty up from about 25p in 2010/11, to 70p in 2012, then a re-rating near 125p by end 2013. The stock is now priced at 119p after its 2013 prelims.

Such a price is over 40 times the latest earnings per share although the price/earnings (P/E) ratio could drop significantly given scope to grow the income statement from a small base.

Pre-tax profit is only just over £1.7 million, the table shows encouraging revenue growth and the "Wildwood" - also "Wildwood Kitchen" - restaurants attract good customer reviews. They offer grills and seafood but a main pitch is pizza/pasta.

Generous rating

Tasty's financial summary
Estimate
Year ended 31 Dec2008200920102011201220132014
Turnover (£million)8.019.1810.614.619.323.2
IFRS3 pre-tax profit (£m)-1.58-2.080.241.071.551.74
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)-0.54-0.060.511.181.663.17
IFRS3 earnings/share (p)-4.73-5.410.562.642.612.9
Normalised earnings/share (p)-1.59-0.161.182.872.914.4
Cash flow per share (p)0.370.992.843.674.94
Capex per share (p)8.340.911.023.367.89
Net tangible assets per share (p)24.519.420.122.124.832.1
Source: Company REFS.

The group comprises of 24 Wildwood chains and six "DimT" restaurants with a range of popular oriental food.

Its shares' generous rating results largely from the involvement of the Kaye brothers, Adam and Sam, who founded and subsequently sold the Ask (previously AIM-listed) and Zizzi chains of Italian restaurants.

They own respectively, 15% and 18.3% of Tasty, and their father Peter founded Garfunkel's.

So there is a sense of proven owner-managers letting the public get a slice of their action via listed shares.

They have adjusted to the times: Wildwood offers "freshly prepared homemade Mediterranean cooking" - which looks good positioning as regards health endorsements for the Mediterranean diet and the appeal of comfort food at reasonable prices.

Favourable reviews

Nowadays any hotel or eating-out establishment falling short, is soon ripped to shreds on forums such as TripAdvisor, but Wildwood's customer reviews have generally been favourable such as: "We would definitely eat here again as it's hard to find places in central London that won't rip you off or make you feel like they are doing you a favour".

And another: "For quality and value this was very special... one of the best meals enjoyed in London (or anywhere!) within this category of style and offerings."

That came from a top contributor of 78 reviews in 28 cities. Meanwhile experiences in Cambridge are mixed similarly reviews of London Victoria Dim T are good overall.

The cut of reviews is, I suggest, key to the long-term prosperity of an emerging restaurant group.

Good momentum

2013 results show good momentum with revenue up 20% to £23.2 million helped by opening five new Wildwood (Kitchen) outlets, more in early 2014 "with a number of other sites in the pipeline."

It reflects the investor appeal of a successful branded concept in casual dining, with roll-out potential. Last October the company raised £2.5 million via a placing of shares at 100p to fund expansion and the end-2013 balance sheet shows cash up from £1.6 million to £3.4 million with only £1 million debt (mostly long-term).

Intangibles constitute under £500,000 versus £15.4 million for property, plant and equipment, i.e. some respite for a share price trading at a 270% premium to net tangible assets per share.

So, while there is investor appeal, be sure to appreciate that Tasty is a speculative share where the sense of "margin of safety" - the true measure of investment grade - amounts to the Kaye's track record than anything quantifiable in the financial results.

Detrimental impact

Also the statement's "principal uncertainties and risks" section cautions of "a high level of uncertainty" with the UK economic outlook.

"Deterioration in consumer confidence due to future economic conditions could have a detrimental impact on the group in terms of footfall and sales."

This is strictly true but examples such as PizzaExpress after the early 1990s' recession and Mid 250-listed Wetherspoon more recently have shown that good food, attractively priced, can win through tough times.

Property prices may be the main challenge: "The acquisition of suitable and well-located quality sites in order to continue the group's expansion is proving to be demanding."

Administrative costs nearly doubled to £944,000 although cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was reduced from 89.2% to 87.9%. Management expects food and labour costs to rise in the medium term.

Operational cash flow is strong, up 35% over £3.2 million, with £4.8 million investment aided by the share issue. Such a development profile explains the lack of dividends.

Complacency towards consumer-driven recovery

It's also possible to regard Tasty's 2013 re-rating as complacency towards the consumer-driven UK recovery with people running down savings and once again resorting to debt.

Certainly wage growth will be important before long. The group's market capitalisation is now 2.7 times annual revenues, i.e. potentially exposed. But if the overall reputation of the restaurants grows then I see upside on a 2 to 3-year view.

While volatility is possible the shares appear to be firmly held by Kaye followers who are likely in for the long haul and a trade sale eventually. So this share is worth being aware of as a long-term tuck-away in an ISA or SIPP.

I recall that Ask shares experienced times out of favour, traders could possibly wait for here, but the Kaye's delivered very well for their backers, hence it will likely need an upset in markets or the UK economy for Tasty to drop.

There is no group website so best derive your opinion from the restaurants (websites) and their reviews.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox