Interactive Investor

Apple: the world's leading momentum play

1st May 2015 09:39

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Is NASDAQ-listed Apple now the world's leading momentum play? The company's second-quarter results to end-March have seen like-for-like revenue jump by 27.1% to $58 billion (£38 billion), net profit by 32.7% to $13.6 billion, earnings per share by 40.1% and the period dividend by 8%.

Such numbers are especially creditable amid a strengthening US dollar which prices goods higher overseas and devalues those revenues/earnings when translated back to US currency. It knocks for six the bearish argument that Apple could not innovate successfully after the Steve Jobs era; indeed, a major refreshment of Apple products was my key rationale in drawing attention at $71 equivalent (pre-stock split) back in August 2013, with the stock trading on a modest 12.5 times earnings. The chief executive currently says: "We're seeing a higher rate of people switching to iPhone than we've experienced in previous cycles, and we're off to an exciting start to the June quarter with the launch of Apple Watch."

"Must-have" iPhone dominates the product portfolio

Admittedly, this puts increasing emphasis on iPhone sales which now represent 68% of Apple's revenues: 61.2 million were sold in just three months versus 37.2 million in the like-for-like period. The release of the iPhone 6 last September has boosted sales and also the average selling price of an iPhone has risen by $62 to $659 in the quarter. Substantial growth is coming from emerging markets which eases concerns that Far Eastern rivals - especially Samsung - would encroach.

Apple -  unaudited, consolidated statement of operations
$ millionThree months ended  
28/03/2015% change29/03/2014
Net sales58,01027.145,646
Cost of sales34,35427,699
Gross margin23,65631.817,947
Operating expenses
R&D1,9181,422
Selling & general3,4602,932
Total5,3784,354
Operating income18,27834.513,593
Other income286255
Income before tax18,56434.313,818
Provision for tax4,9953,595
Net income13,56932,710,223
Earnings per share
Basic ($) 2.34 40.1 1.67
Diluted ($) 2.33 1.66
No. Shares Basic 5,793,799 6,123,302
Diluted 5,834,858 6,156,699
Dividends per share ($) 0.47 6.8 0.44

The Chinese New Year helped Apple sell more iPhones there than its home market for the first time: China revenues surged 71% compared with 19% in the Americas. Socially, a lot more Chinese are becoming middle class with the iPhone ideally placed as a "must-have" status symbol. It also implies a December 2013 deal with China Mobile, the world's largest carrier, is working well. To date, 21 Apple stores have opened in China with 40 more targeted by mid-2016.

The progress may have cannibalised iPad sales, however, down from 19.5 million to 12.6 million like-for-like, and against 21.4 million in Apple's first quarter - the iPhone 6's larger screen reducing the iPad's appeal. Apple Mac sales edged up from four million to 4.6 million, albeit down from 5.5 million in Q1. The Apple Watch smartwatch priced from $349 has just been launched with demand out-stripping supply, currently available in nine countries. Mind how consumers' real verdict has yet to be given, and achieving anywhere near the status as the iPhone will depend much on how Apple responds to this and evolves the product in the years ahead.

Bumper capital growth and shareholder returns

The quarter's financial momentum has also meant $19 billion cash flow in aid of Apple’s extending its capital return programme by $70 billion to $200 billion by end of March 2017. It has significantly resulted from shareholder activists pressing in recent years for greater return of Apple's soaring cash hoard; this and a stock split to reduce perception of a "heavy" market price over $500 was why I drew attention again at $81.4 equivalent ahead of the 7-for-1 split last June.

Showing how specialist technology analysts are not always right, the consensus of Apple analysts then reckoned on 6.5% upside in the stock - but it has risen ten times that, including dividends, and is still rated modestly considering the commercial momentum. The essential point I made a year ago was: "expectations can swiftly rise as the iPhone extends its appeal globally."

Hence, it is odd to conservative eyes how the capital return programme is involving debt, although the company was encouraged - if not prodded - to do so by shareholder activists. So far, over $112 billion has been "returned" including $80 billion share repurchases which it is also possible to question as a true return. The dividend needs to rise anyway to constitute a worthwhile yield, projected up from 1.5% to 1.9%, if fairly generous in tech-stock context. The near-term objective for raising the dividend is 11%.

Price/earnings rating is relatively modest

A technology share tends to be valued primarily on price/earnings (P/E) relative to the underlying growth story, and at about $132 currently Apple's historic multiple of 18 falls to 14 if the 12-month forward consensus forecast is fair. This compares with 12-month trailing P/E multiples of 21 for the S&P 500 index and 23.2 for the Nasdaq 100; and on a 12-month forward basis, 18 and 19.5 respectively - so there is ample scope for buyers to reckon on comparative value.

As if it is not hard enough anyway to find stocks with such revenue and earnings momentum. These qualities quite give Apple a defensive profile, refreshingly free of deflationary risks that dog many others. Its brand power confers relative freedom to price, versus the competition, indeed Apple appears what economists call a Giffen good, where people consume more as the price rises - violating laws of demand. Arguably the stock rating should incorporate this better.

Blue chip attractions

The five-year chart looks as if Apple has had a plenty good run, i.e. the risk/reward profile is more dicey now. It will, therefore, be interesting to see if the fundamentals I outline - which point to significant further upside - prove more influential.

Apple has another blue chip attraction: as a liquid means for sterling-based investors to get US dollar exposure. Currencies can always surprise and the dollar has just lately taken a dip; but the balance of probability suggests further strength as the Fed edges towards raising interest rates.

Meanwhile, post-election Britain could mean weak government hurting confidence in sterling. Partly as a sterling hedge and offering good liquidity trading in London, Apple is one of the easier US stocks for UK investors to engage.

For more information see www.apple.com/about.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox