Interactive Investor

Stockwatch: This attractive share thrives on volatility

19th June 2015 10:38

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Is Record finally making music? For the last two to three years this FTSE Fledgling currency manager has traded sideways in terms of underlying financials and share price - significantly due to low volatility in financial markets while central banks have pursued exceptional monetary easing.

However, change is afoot following last January's 18% one-day movement in the Swiss Franc versus the Euro, and a 28% rise in the US dollar versus the Euro in the year to March 2015. Central banks don't want to delay normalising monetary policy (cutting back QE and raising interest rates), but there are still major risks to the system such as Greece, and rising US rates spell trouble for developing countries' debts as they are largely denominated in US dollars. Even if major crises are avoided, there is a shift in expectations underway that more currency volatility is the likely scenario in the years ahead.

This is attracting interest in the currency management services provided by Record plc, which aims to help clients with risk-reducing hedging or capital return strategies. This is mainly achieved through transactions in spot (present) and forward foreign exchange contracts, also a wider range of instruments to help achieve clients' objectives. Revenue generated is strictly fee-based, and there is no evidence the company is inclined to take a (leveraged) gamble on markets - possibly taking an exceptional hit - which is the usual risk to watch for in currency management.

Financials now improving after consolidation years

Latest results for the year to end-March 2015 show pre-tax profit up 18% to £7.7 million on revenue up 6% to £21.1 million, with basic earnings per share up 7.3% to 2.66p. The "assets under management" measures are a bit confusing to judge versus typical asset managers, because Record manages only the impact of foreign exchanges not the underlying assets. So revenue/profit is probably the better verdict of underlying dynamics; furthermore, management says the majority of its growth in clients and assets came late in the financial year, so the full benefit will be felt in 2015/16. There is always going to be some uncertainty as to the extent that engaging potential new clients translates into real business, but this activity is currently proceeding at a high level.

Record - financial summary
Estimate

Year ended 31 Mar

2010201120122013201420152016
Turnover (£m)33.428.220.518.619.921.1
IFRS3 pre-tax proft (£m)16.612.56.76.16.5
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)16.612.56.76.16.57.78
IFRS3 earnings/share (p)5.442.222.52.7
Normalised earnings/share (p)5.442.222.52.72.9
Earnings growth rate (%)-38.3-25.1-44.7-11.224.77.39.4
Price/earnings multiple (x)13.912.8
Cash flow/share (p)2.93.81.22.62.4
Capex/share (p)0.30.40.100
Dividend per share (p)4.64.61.51.51.51.651.65
Dividend per share growth (%)34.2-5829-78200
Yield (%)  4.54.5
Covered by earnings (x)1.20.81.51.31.71.61.8
Net tangible assets per share (p)11.412.711.412.512.9
Source: Company REFS.

Earnings quality may also be improving with a more diverse spread of clients and products helping with currency issues irrespective of the economic cycle, A strong base of "passive hedging" clients has been built, which, although lower margin, accounts for nearly three-quarters of assets under management. At £8.1 million, its fee contribution has increased from 28% to 40% of total management fees, versus £9.4 million for dynamic hedging. That's down from £11.9 million as a result of cutting fee rates, with "currency-for-return" stable around £2.8 million. Performance fees only contributed £0.5 million, which only applied to two mandates in dynamic hedging - so you are not going to see volatility like in hedge fund performance fees.

Where the set-up is less "outside shareholder-friendly" is the 30% of original operating profit made available to be awarded to staff - a fairly typical city bonus scheme that management would probably argue is vital to attract and retain the best people. "High water marks" do not appear to apply though, e.g. where hedge fund managers must regain any losses before a performance element kicks in.

At least Record directors and senior managers are required to take a proportion of this bonus in shares, subject to a lock-up. On one hand it is a motivating factor, but on another, still a check on earnings growth and in principle also the P/E multiple - currently around 12 times anticipated earnings for the year to end-March 2016. In practice, listed asset management firms with such schemes can still become highly rated if the business does really well.

Dividend potential is likely more positive than conveyed

Notwithstanding quite a volatile record, the total annual payout is up 10% to 1.65p a share, i.e. an historic yield of about 4.5% with the stock currently at around 37p to buy. This is amply supported by £8.0 million of cash generated from operations with financial year-end cash at £12.0 million - last year's dividend payments cost £3.3 million. The board appears very cautious by way of stating it expects to maintain the total dividend at 1.65p, in a context where the business is improving and looks to be supportive. Indeed, the 30 April forecasts by Edison (see table, and which are sponsored by Record) could be conservative also.

Dividends will be set "at least covered by earnings and which allows for future sustainable dividend growth in line with the trend in profitability, such that the total dividend may be more or less than 1.65p a share." This is rather contorted and also contradictory in that "sustained dividend growth" doesn't equate with "more or less than 1.65p", but they probably just want to be prudent and ensure healthy earnings cover. If the business grows then it follows the dividend policy will be more expansive. There is already precedent of 4.6p per share in the 2010 and 2011 financial years.

Also in support of dividends, the table shows very low capital expenditure versus decent cash flow, i.e. the business profile is conducive for shareholder returns - and Record's priority has been genuine returns, which means ordinary dividends rather than buybacks. If earnings per share can recover to at least 4p (as previously achieved in 2010 and 2011) then a 2-3p per share dividend should be possible, implying a prospective yield up to 8% at 37p currently - in which case the stock will re-rate to price the yield more competitively.

So in conclusion, if currency volatility is set to rise in years ahead then Record's risk/reward profile looks attractive.

For more information see recordcm.co.uk

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox