Interactive Investor

Five shares for the watchlist

14th April 2016 12:00

Richard Beddard from interactive investor

Each month, companies analyst Richard Beddard trawls through annual corporate results for his Watchlist and the Share Sleuth portfolio of companies that satisfy key valuation metrics such as earnings yield and return on capital - and profiles the most interesting candidates.

Watch: ARM Holdings

If you were to search for a wellspring of technological change, ARM would be a good place to start.

The company designs microprocessors that are manufactured into silicon chips by semiconductor companies and embedded into electronic devices, most notably smartphones.

In the year ending 31 December 2015, ARM earned 22% more revenue than it did in the previous year, and 31% more in adjusted profit. Cash flows were prodigious, return on capital enviable.

It grew market share, incorporating mobile devices and also network infrastructure, servers and embedded devices (the so-called "internet of things"), to 32%. In 2014, its market share was 30%. The year before that it was 28%.

ARM licences microprocessor designs to semiconductor manufacturers for a fee, and earns royalties when they ship chips incorporating ARM-based microprocessors.

A growing number of licences increases revenue now, and future revenue from royalties. ARM signed 173 new licences in 2015 - 10 more than in 2014 - bringing the total number of active licences to 1,348.

A share price of 1,013p values the enterprise at £14 billion, or about 42 times adjusted profit. The earnings yield is 2%. For any normal company, that valuation is preposterously high, but ARM is abnormal.

It's the outsourced research and development partner for much of the global semiconductor manufacturing industry. Its efficient processor designs, already ubiquitous in smartphones, could come to dominate other sectors. That said, smartphone growth is slowing.

Add: Intercontinental Hotels

Intercontinental Hotels, the owner of InterContinental, Holiday Inn, Crowne Plaza and other famous hotel brands is in good shape, having sold its hotels.

In full-year results to 31 December 2015, InterContinental achieved a fall in revenue of 3% compared to the previous year, and an increase in adjusted profit of 4%.

The fall in revenue and modest profit growth is not wholly indicative of the company's performance. During the year, it disposed of hotels and other assets worth nearly $1.4 billion (£980 million), including the InterContinental Paris Le Grand, and the InterContinental Hong Kong.

The disposals mark the completion of a programme of hotel sales that will partly pay for a $1.5 billion special dividend if approved by shareholders, and will mean the company has returned £12 billion since 2003.

The business is now a service company. It franchises the brands to hotel owners, and manages hotels for them. It earns 95% of revenue in fees, and in 2015 fee revenue rose 7%.

The company says revenue per available room increased by 4.4% and it added 4.8% more rooms. Worldwide, InterContinental brands account for about three quarters of a million rooms in 5,000 hotels, the majority in the US.

A share price of 2,760p values the enterprise at £7 billion (18 times adjusted profit). The earnings yield is 6%.

While the shares aren't cheap, since it started selling hotels the company has hived off its most profitable business and focused on developing it. A 25% return on capital suggests it's doing a good job.

Watch: Rolls-Royce

Rolls-Royce reports underlying pre-tax profit down 12% in the full year to December 2015, although at the operating level adjusted profit rose 7%.

The good news is that Rolls-Royce is still profitable. Return on capital was a healthy 11%, only a fraction below the company's average over the past 10 years, although that estimate excludes various one-off costs.

Chief executive Warren East says most of Rolls-Royce's markets are steady, but it must tackle the weak oil and gas market (which affects its marine division) while investing heavily in civil aerospace.

In the marine division, Rolls-Royce experienced a 16% drop in revenue and a 94% fall in profit due to low demand and restructuring costs.

Civil aerospace is Rolls-Royce's biggest division and strategically it's most important since. With GE, Rolls-Royce operates in a virtual duopoly supplying wide-body jet engines.

The company must invest to increase engine building capacity and meet demand for new engines such as the Trent 7000 and XWB-97.

These engines will earn a stream of profit for Rolls-Royce for decades through TotalCare service contracts, but the cost of preparing the engines and factories for production and delayed recognition of profit in the accounts will impact financial performance over the next few years.

The impending introduction of new engines in 2017 and 2018 is also reducing demand for the older, less efficient engines they will replace.

Due to its reputation, engineering expertise and dominant position in segments of the aero-engine market, the company probably has a prosperous future, but the next few years will be tough and the company's accounting is extremely complicated.

A share price of 683p values the enterprise at over £16 billion, or 12 times adjusted profit. The earnings yield is 8%. That's probably good value, but adding Rolls-Royce shares at this level would be a triumph of faith in the business over uncertain accounting numbers.

Add: Wynnstay

Wynnstay's share price has lost a lot of the froth that stopped it being an attractive investment. The company says the growing global population and increasing emphasis on self-sufficiency drive demand for food, but downward pressure on prices requires efficiency gains.

Either way, the company profits. Full-year results for the year to October 2015 show the second factor - downward pressure on food prices caused in part by high global stocks of food - is weighing on UK agriculture, and therefore efficiency, rather than rising prices, is driving profitability.

Wynnstay manufactures, processes and distributes feed, fertiliser, seed and raw materials for farmers, as well as retailing them through a chain of country stores. It also operates the Just for Pets chain of pet shops.

The company increased adjusted profit 5% compared to the same period in 2014, on revenues that were 9% lower (mostly due to lower commodity prices rather than lower volumes).

Despite a number of small acquisitions, it finished the year with relatively insignificant borrowings and net cash.

Stability comes from diversity - Wynnstay supplies arable, dairy and meat farms - and efficiency comes from scale, with the company expanding into central and eastern England.

A share price of 460p values the enterprise at £115 million, or about 15 times adjusted earnings. The earnings yield is 7%. It's a reasonable price to pay for stability.

Add: XP Power

XP Power's results confirm the business's decade-long transformation. In the year to December 2015, XP Power earned 9% more revenue and 4% more profit than it did in 2014, although much of the improvement was due to currency fluctuations.

Weak growth in its biggest market, the US, was compensated for by strong growth in Asia and Europe. It anticipates revenue growth in 2016. The company has also increased borrowings modestly to make two small acquisitions.

XP, which has an enterprise value of over £300 million, acquired EMCO for £7 million. It says the opportunity to sell EMCO's products through its presumably much larger sales operation makes the acquisition a significant growth opportunity.

US-based EMCO manufactures high voltage DC (direct current) power supplies.

It's a new niche for XP, which specialises in power adaptors that convert mains AC (alternating current) to DC for the same markets. The second acquisition was a 51% stake in a South Korean distributor. It customises power supplies, including XP's, for equipment manufacturers.

A share price of 1,606p values the enterprise at £324 million, about 16 times adjusted profit. The earnings yield is 6%. XP trades on a fairly full valuation, but the company has changed the way it does business over more than a decade.

Originally a distributor, today it designs and manufactures the majority of its products. Customers, who commit to including XP adapters in their products for many years, seem to like those products better. The result is high returns on capital and strong cash flow.

This article is for information and discussion purposes only and does not form a recommendation to invest or otherwise. The value of an investment may fall. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.