Interactive Investor

Stockwatch: A value play with 23% upside

6th January 2017 10:11

by Edmond Jackson from interactive investor

Share on

Has a near two-year fall in mid-cap soft drinks company Britvic finally established an inflection point, as now underlined by a bullish, reverse head-and-shoulders pattern?

In some respects Britvic's trend has typified the market: on the back of quantitative easing (QE) the shares roared to test 780p a share in 2012/13, before traders cashed in awaiting earnings proof.

In fairness, the table shows respectable single-digit earnings growth for a £1 billion-plus company, notwithstanding a slip to 2% growth in the current financial year.

The "head" of a head-and-shoulders pattern is defined by a drop to 525p after the 30 November prelims affirmed "challenging" prospects. But the dividend yield is kicking in - even after a recovery to 585p the prospective yield is 4.5% twice covered by forecast earnings.

There have been concerns over higher input costs and government action against sugary drinks, but reading the detail of Britvic's statements, management is already creating efficiencies and capitalising on public demand for low/no sugar drinks.

New Year interest

The stock is also rising after another Brazilian acquisition, with several brokers re-iterating 'buy' and targeting 680p to 725p - which implies a forward price/earnings (PE) ratio of 13 and sub-4% yield as a more appropriate rating. The group derived 64% of revenues from the UK in 2015/16, but should benefit to some extent from its exposure to France (17%) and Ireland (9%), assuming the euro doesn't fall further in a potential crisis year.

Britvic is 'the cheapest stock' on 11.5 times its 2017/18 earnings' estimates

Brazil, the world's sixth largest soft drinks market, represented 6% of group revenue as a result of the £114 million acquisition of Ebba in July 2015 - a leading supplier of concentrates and nectar drinks, popular in Sao Paulo and the North East. After this subsidiary achieved 19% revenue growth in the last year, Britvic has extended its interests with the £54.5 million acquisition of Bela Ischia Alimentos, market leaders in Rio de Janeiro.

Britvic claims "substantial annual cost synergies" for combining the operations, and Morgan Stanley looks for low single-digit earnings enhancement in the first full year. This also derives from debt-funding (an existing facility) which is manageable despite Britvic's weak net cash flow while capital spending remains high: see the trend in capex versus cash flow in the table, which leapt last year.

Morgan Stanley reckons Britvic is "the cheapest stock in our coverage universe" on 11.5 times its estimate of 2017/18 earnings per share (EPS). I would add that's interesting from a US investment bank, also considering the post-referendum drop in sterling, as it makes Britvic attractive especially for US acquirers.

Rising cost inflation

Exacerbating the early December plunge to 525p was a change in stance by Goldman Sachs from "conviction buy" to "neutral". The broker was concerned about rising input cost inflation in the UK, although management reckons it can mitigate this through cost savings and "revenue management activities" - it would help if this was clarified better.

Last year a transformational three-year investment programme (hence the rise in capex) was declared to deliver better supply chain flexibility/efficiency, quantified as a minimum 15% improvement at the operating profit level from a net £240 million net investment.

So Goldman's concern was possibly overdone, although it could have just been an excuse to tidy up its "conviction buy" list at the end of the year, the stock having under-performed since Goldman's added Britvic two years ago. The medium-term prospect for costs remains quite a guess, given the uncertainty for input inflation, but if said efficiency improvements are achieved then they should contain it.

Soft drinks, anyone?

Last year's results showed a circa 10% rise in profits on revenue up 10.1% to £1,431.3 million, albeit like-for-like revenue up only 0.4%.

There was some variance with carbonated drinks up 5.3% like-for-like in the UK whereas still drinks were "challenged" - Robinsons declined after added sugar was removed from the range and there was "very competitive" own-label pricing by supermarkets. "J20 had a weak Christmas (2015) and our limited-edition flavours performed poorly this year", however J20 Spritz, a low-sugar sparkling variant, performed well.

The number of under-25's abstaining has leapt 40% in eight years to more than a quarter

While a mixed reflection on the brands, this may reflect a general shift to carbonated drinks as no/low sugar versions of Pepsi Max, 7UP and Tango (Britvic is a PepsiCo distributor) all did well in the UK.

7UP Free outperformed its category with double-digit growth last year and Tango delivered its best performance in over a decade. Clearly, such legacy brands can flourish if they adapt. 2017 will include new offerings such as the re-launch and extension of R Whites Lemonade, new adult premium brands and premium mixers.

A positive long-term factor is that teetotalism flourishing - the number of under-25's abstaining has leapt 40% in eight years to more than a quarter of this segment. Despite an alcohol crisis among affluent older people, one in five of the UK population don't drink and it's one in three for London - presenting a big marketing opportunity for non-alcoholic drinks.

Another angle is sports drinks amid the machismo for triathlon, endurance cycling and the like, which Britvic could acquire into. So the war on sugar could end up net positive, boosting demand for new refreshments.

Buy territory

Admittedly, Britvic isn't expected to deliver the financial proof of its fine words on brand and efficiency improvements until 2018. But there's a parallel in the way the chart is bottoming out and how the company is fighting forward in the sugar war and to cut costs; in which context Goldman's downgrade is a classic capitulation.

This company ought to exemplify how Britain can flourish outside the EU single market, already exporting to some 50 countries globally with franchise partnerships in the US, Australia and India.

It should benefit from fresh trade agreements and lower sterling, and shareholders from rising overseas revenues in growth markets such as Brazil. On that basis its equity is now in 'buy' territory as the chart affirms.

For more information, visit the website.

Britvic - financial summaryConsensus estimates
year ended 02 October2012201320142015201620172018
Turnover (£ million)12561322134413001431
IFRS3 pre-tax profit (£m)77.582.6120138152
Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)85.1120136148164159172
Operating margin (%)9.211.111.913.112.9
IFRS3 earnings/share (p)22.425.336.241.243.5
Normalised earnings/share (p)24.539.142.745.348.349.253.4
Earnings per share growth (%)-20.359.59.366.628.4
Price/earnings multiple (x)12.111.911
Annual average historic P/E (x)12.41817.716.414.4
Cash flow/share (p)42.947.449.858.442.9
Capex/share (p)19.514.423.322.944
Dividend per share (p)17.917.86.121.523.32526.7
Yield (%)44.34.6
Covered by earnings (x)1.52.32.32.22.122
Net tangible assets per share (p)-111-113-87.8-35.7-52.1
Source: Company REFS

This article is for information and discussion purposes only and does not form a recommendation to invest or otherwise. The value of an investment may fall. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox