(JLP.L) Jubilee Platinum PLC Buy/Sell

32.25 -1.00 (-3.01%) Down arrow Add to portfolio Set Alert Level 2 Desktop Trader

Discussion

find any discussion board:

1 to 20 of 348 Messages

Post New Message
Date/Time	Subject	Author
Open or Close all Posts
Sat 10:11	Is te SA Govt meddling in Conroast?	Cpt Lawnmower	2


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Forgive me for extending the conspiracy theory but: I wonder if the conspiracy is about the South African government not wanting the Conroast license to go to a non-SA based company, especially a big player like Xstrata or Ruukki. Don't forget that Conroast is owned by the SA government via Mintek. Also remember that the unions are pressuring the government to protect SA mining through nationalisation. Also remember that a very prominent figure in the SA government is on the board of JLP following merger with BRR (Dr Mathews Phosa). Also note how SLV got access to Conroast very shortly after the takeover of Ruukki failed, JLP and SLV buddying up like chums when they ought to have been at each others' throats. In my opinion a slow consolidation of South African based juniors with the purpose of spreading the Conroast license around to specific SA companies is in progress right now. More \| View thread (1) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Sat 09:22	Re: RBC update to outperform (Wendy)	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	TG5 - look up the meaning of the word viable. It does NOT mean economically feasible, but technically achievable. ------------------------------------------ No it doesn't! Adj. 1. viable - capable of being done with means at hand and circumstances as they are. More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Sat 09:20	Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	TG5 - look up the meaning of the word viable. It does NOT mean economically feasible, but technically achievable. -------------------- More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 22:05	Re: RBC update to outperform (Wendy)	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	And I don't need to look up the word 'viable' either! More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 20:24	Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Now for Yoda. Very simply, you should be prime minister............. Decipher that as you wish............................... Tg5 More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 20:18	Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Wendy First......... Wendy, I do not need to look up the word feasible, I know what it means! It was Mintek 75, technical programme. by R.J. I've read it several times and you've posted on it as many times! Teething problems are still problems, are they not, for whatever reason? The results from the first update after commissioning clearly show poor results for the months of October and November - for whatever reason. I didn't question run out and why because I already knew why they had it! Until I see the first lot of results from the continuing operation of the plant I will reserve judgment. I think that is my prerogative. I honestly believe everything is fine, but I'll find out until they release their first set of results, won't I! I don't contact companies direct as you know! I actually believe Conroast is the way forward, but I still want to see hard facts showing a continuation or operations from the Randburg plant; I don’t think there is anything wrong with that! Also, the BoD need to be a little more transparent going forward, like I have been saying. Tg5 More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 20:04	Re: RBC update to outperform	touchincloth


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	...oh please you lot (yoda, TG5, Wendy, P Pete), give it a rest ! you are all better than this- stop your squabbling ...he said that and she said this. Lets have some factual debate about JLP, their technologies, prospects, management, resources etc without the pages of back biting. It helps none of us here, who after all share a common goal of making money on sound investments based upon facts and educated predictions. More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 18:24	Re: RBC update to outperform	Yoda


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	'feasible' as a reult........!! More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 18:17	Re: RBC update to outperform	Yoda	2


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Gambler, Read my original post again, I did not mentioned anything about viability in February. I even gave you the reasons why that decision was made in February, so I am not sure what your problem is? I am talking about now, not 10 months ago, why would I want to go over news that old? As for the smelter, they did not have problems 'ramping it up' last September, it 'ramped up' fine. What they did find was a way of debottling the feed entry point so that more tailings could enter at any one time, was that not the point of a demonstration model? You are twisting facts. As for 3 months ago and fair value, you're having a laugh right? BRR were broke, they had no cash or revenue stream, they had suffered from low revenue that almost put them out of business, one of the reasons was due to the old CEO and his stupid contracts. The same guy who you acclaim to be a wonderful CEO, the same guy who has gone on to c0ckitup at the next company he went to. While being disapointed with the t/over price, I am more relieved that I and many genuine people on this bb ended up with JLP shares rather than a big fat zero in their portfolio!!!!! It is 5 months since that deal and the price was struck, not only have PGM and Nickel prices recovered dramatically since, but sulphur has dropped dramatically, projects are becoming viable as a result. A victim of circumstance, I keep telling ya kid, that's why the BRR t/o price was what it was, no point harping on about it. Remember when I told you the smelter was going to be switched back on after the 1.5 Mw upgrade, you rubbished my comment. So I then told you the date it would happen? You rubbished that to. Remember recently when I mentioned that the smelter had been switched? You rubbished that post too. What is the common denominator their Gambler? That's right, my tea boy was right. regards Yoda More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 17:45	Re: RBC update to outperform	fortunatas	2


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	dont like posters posting bearish garbage either More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 17:22	Re: RBC update to outperform	Wendy Durham	10	1


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	TG5 - look up the meaning of the word viable. It does NOT mean economically feasible, but technically achievable. As for the Randburg smelter, the best guide is Rodney Jones's overview published in June at the Mintek 75 (70? can't be bothered to look it up) celebration event. After a few teething problems with so many different elements - including a totally new pneumatic feed system - being introduced at once, it took everything they could throw at it bar high sulphur, which - in the absence of a roaster (which would be part of any new build) - led to a super-runny alloy and caused a minor run-out which was repaired in pretty short order at very low cost. This is the only problem at Randburg, where there is no roaster installed. If they keep the sulphur content down - as now seems likely because they are smelting UG2 - then there is no difficulty. You do really need to understand how it all works, TG5, before making such high handed statements. More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 15:52	HOLD Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5		1


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Yoda, Was the project not viable then in February? If not, and you agree with the report at least admit you were wrong. Because you stated it was viable on many occassions! Is the Venmyn report wrong??? Is it viable now? Is it not viable now? 3 months ago is wasn't when working out a 'fair' value for BRR!! I also suggest you read the last 3 paragraphs of the report again regarding WA!!! As for the demo plant, I haven't suggested there is a problem, just stated facts which can be found on the BRR news tab on the BRR board! Get your facts right Also, when the plant was commissioned last year in September they had problems ramping up which took us through to December, they never told the PI until they'd sorted it? So why do you think I would expect the company to tell us now? I see huge potential here, but I don't like posters posting bullish garbage that can't be backed up! When will that 'sink in'? Again, I never suggested there was a problem, I suggested there could be a problem. There could as far as I'm concerned, until I am told otherwise, not by you and the tea boy Tg5 More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 14:41	Re: RBC update to outperform	ibmay	1


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Yoda, I do not think that most ex BRR shareholders will be jumping with joy to learn that the WA project is now deemed viable a few months after it was not deemed economically feasible for the purposes of the merger valuation. More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 14:03	Re: RBC update to outperform	Yoda	4


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Back to your old ways I see gambler, the facade never lasts long does it!! The Venmyn report to which you refer clearly reports from February 2009. We are now in November 2009, during which time sulphur prices (an expense to the company when processing Nickel tailings) have plunged from extraordinary highs and the Nickle price has doubled!! During this time BRR have reported that work with BHPB has continued. They have been attempting to reduce every last cent of Opex and Capex, checking every nut and bolt with the aim of bringing these costs down. Leon advised in July an rns that "The Leinster project is moving steadily forward. We continue to be cautiously optimistic of the project's merits, and have maintained our area of focus amid the recently announced corporate activity." Why do you need the company to tell you the smelter is working fine. They have told you it is working and have not informed you that there is a problem. You spout out comments on this bb suggesting there is a problem with it and have no evidence to back it up. If you had a brain you would contact the company and ask them. I did. It is working and there is nothing wrong with it!!!!!! regards Yoda More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 07:59	Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5		4


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	For reference, BRR RNS released on the 20/01/2009 - The project wasn't vaible! HIGH SULPHUR RECOVERY RATES, LOW PROCESSING COSTS * Sees initial capex at $415 mln to $444 mln * Total operating costs seen at $3.85/lb to $4.07/lb * Shares rise about 14 pct (Adds details) Jan 20 (Reuters) - Platinum and nickel producer Braemore Resources Plc said on Tuesday its Leinster nickel tailings project in Australia was viable as studies showed high sulphur recovery rates and low processing costs, sending its shares up about 14 percent. Braemore said project viability was confirmed at average production rate of 12,500 tonnes per annum of nickel as intermediate product, which is one of the main determining factors for capital costs. The company expects total operating costs of $3.85/lb to $4.07/lb, with preliminary capital expenditure of $415 million to $444 million. The acid plant is expected to cost $181 million to $185 million depending on the scale of the plant and the sulphur source, it said. The company said capital and operating costs could be reduced further through the continued refinement of the project. At 1222 GMT, Braemore shares were up 0.23 pence at 1.9 pence on the London Stock Exchange............... ------------------------- What you are now telling me Yoda is that it is viable and the venmyn report should have been updated to give a fair price for Braemore! You really are rather misinformed or just walking round with rose tinted glasses on, or so far stuck up your contacts ass I don't know were you start and end! Regards Tg5 More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 07:51	Re: RBC update to outperform	The Gambler5


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Can you not read Yoda! Do you not trust the independent report Venmyn completed? To help you out - Page 3 of 16! When I get an update from th company telling me the the plant is working fine, whether that be in a quarterly update or not, I'll take it as hear say! I won't take your word for it, or some teaboys either! http://www.jubileeplatinum.com/releases/braemore_fairness_opinion_030909.pdf More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Fri 07:11	Sylvania Presentation	BRRMARK	1


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	..upbeat and positive http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/8314C_-2009-11-20.pdf More \| View thread (1) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Thu 21:00	Re: RBC update to outperform	gingerneil


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	Well said Yoda. We get quarterly updates from most companies, don't see why JLP should be any different. More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Thu 20:50	Re: RBC update to outperform	Yoda	4


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	I can't believe some of the rubbish written on here. Do you guys seriously expect the company to throw out masses of info the minute the merger goes through! Give it time, the complettion only went through last week!!! Let's at least get one thing straight, the ConRoast smelter is working, there have been no reports of any issues, so you can take it that it is working perfectly. Production updates are likely to follow, but the company are not going to give us a weekly or even monthly report that some on here seem to be crying out for!!!! They never have and never will. IMO, at best we will get quarterly reports. They also do not have to say the smelter is at full capacity as one or two stupidly keep asking for. It can only operate at a level that matches the amount of feed stock they are able to get their hands on. If you contact the company they will tell you there are no issues with the smelter. As for gamblers comment that the WA Nickel project is not viable, well that is not what BRR have suggested, they did give indications at what price it was viable. When will it sink in!!!! From memory it was around $5 per lb, Nickel has been between $7.50 and $9 for 4 months. I could go on and mention the price of sulphur has fallen dramatically from the unbelievable high which means OpEx is certainly less than it has been recently, this is a major factor. Tjate is a definate 5/6 years away, so for near term cash we are therefore reliant on the toll smelting and WA. The toll side will pay for the overheads and provide a small profit. WA though could prove very profitable and could be up and running quite quickly if BHP come on board. They have been expected to respond for the last 6 months and as I have said previously, their input in could come at any time. regards Yoda More \| View thread (29) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Thu 17:34	Mines & Money 2009	robers98


	View Author's profile \| Add to favourites \| Ignore \| Author's posts
	December 2nd has a 10min presentation slot, maybe some news by then!! http://minesandmoney.mining-events.com/london/programme http://minesandmoney.mining-events.com/london/speakers http://minesandmoney.mining-events.com/london/exhibitors More \| View thread (1) \| Respond \| Login to Vote up \| Login to Vote down
Result Pages: 1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 \| 7 \| 8 \| 9 \| 10 \| Next Search archive Search discussion archive from until

Be automatically updated! Get this discussion by RSS. See sample screenshot
Click here for the feed: Atom 0.3 or RSS Feed, or learn more about the benefits RSS

The content of the messages posted represents the opinions of the author, and does not represent the opinions of Interactive Investor Trading Limited or its affiliates and has not been approved or issued by Interactive Investor Trading Limited. You should be aware that the other participants of the above discussion group are strangers to you and may make statements which may be misleading, deceptive or wrong. Please remember that the value of investments or income from them may go down as well as up and that the past performance of an investment is not a guide to its performance in the future.

The discussion boards on this site are intended to be an information sharing forum and is not intended to address your particular requirements. Whilst information provided on them can help with your investment research you need to consider carefully whether you should make (or refraining from making) investment or other decisions based on what you see without doing further research on investments you are interested in. Participating in this forum cannot be a substitute for obtaining advice from an appropriate expert independent adviser who takes into account your circumstances and specific investment needs in selected investments that are appropriate for you.

Discussion Board Terms & Conditions FSA Market Abuse Fact Sheet