logo

Editor's Pick: The week ahead....

(LLOY.L) Lloyds Banking Group PLC Buy/Sell

88.12 -1.79 (-1.99%) Down arrow Add to portfolio Set Alert Level 2 Desktop Trader

Discussion

find any discussion board:
 

Post message
Switch off smileys
List  Previous  Next  View thread
Respond | Vote up | Vote down | Email to a friend | Neighbourhood Watch
Author nest-egg     View Profile | Add to favourites | Ignore
Date posted 2009-11-07 17:21
Subject Consider This 
Votes for this Posting Voted UP 4 times. Voted DOWN 2 times.
Message
LBG are intending to raise £13.5BN from a rights issue. LBG have to pay HMG £2.5BN for a fictious APS.

I beleive LBG were blackmailed by the Government into paying this Extortionate amount in order that HMG would free them to leave the APS and raise capital from its existing shareholders, this is illegal.

Any discount we shareholders would have received from this RI has been gobbled up by the £2.5BN paid to HMG, which constitutes as 18.5% of the total RI.

Therefore is LBG did not have to pay for insurance they did not receive, possibly the RI could have been in the amount of (£13.5bn - £2.5bn) = £11.5bn, which is what was originally estimated and reported.

HMG are desperate for money from anywhere they can extort to fill in the holes left by Labours financial incompetence whilst running the country. This Government will do anything whilst they are desparate and I fear most for the 16% of RBS investors where HMG have greater control.

If Gordon Brown and the Labour government were genuinely concerned about the banking sector and how they can help repair the damage then they would not have charged LBG for an insurance scheme that they never had.

If they genuinely want LBG to stand on its own two feet for the betterment of the UK economy then they would have allowed the RI to go ahead without HMG involvement.

Currently the RI capital raising consists of HMG £5.8bn / Public Invetsors £7.7bn.

Now if HMG let LBG go it alone and did not charge them £2.5bn then they could have raised £11.5bn in the market, allowing LBG to step in the right direction.

For years Gordon Brown has been preaching light touch banking regulation and now he is going to the other extremity and putting shackles on the bank which will prevent them from recovery and consequently prevent the UK economy from recovering. I beleive the USA has got the balance right and US banks are being allowed to pay back Tarp whilst they can. The reason for this is that they know that banking is international and they want to give their banks the competitive eadge.

I do beleive Brown is preaching to other countries to supress there banks through more regulation, and then more regulation and they end bonuses and waive goodbye to their best staff, but behind his back they are taking no notice as they know they will become more competitive than British banks.

I look forward to the May 2010 general election so we can get rid of Gordon Brown and his Labour government.

I do beleive the Tories understand that the banking sector is core to the success of the British economy and it is therefore important to help the banks recover in any way they can. Not necessarily confident in Osborne but his advisers, Kenneth Clark and William Hague.



Respond | Vote up | Vote down | Email to a friend | Neighbourhood Watch
Switch off smileys
List  Previous  Next  View thread
Respond
The content of the messages posted represents the opinions of the author, and does not represent the opinions of Interactive Investor Trading Limited or its affiliates and has not been approved or issued by Interactive Investor Trading Limited. You should be aware that the other participants of the above discussion group are strangers to you and may make statements which may be misleading, deceptive or wrong. Please remember that the value of investments or income from them may go down as well as up and that the past performance of an investment is not a guide to its performance in the future.

The discussion boards on this site are intended to be an information sharing forum and is not intended to address your particular requirements. Whilst information provided on them can help with your investment research you need to consider carefully whether you should make (or refraining from making) investment or other decisions based on what you see without doing further research on investments you are interested in. Participating in this forum cannot be a substitute for obtaining advice from an appropriate expert independent adviser who takes into account your circumstances and specific investment needs in selected investments that are appropriate for you.

Discussion Board Terms & Conditions FSA Market Abuse Fact Sheet

Jump back to site navigation