So, should Mr Sharma really have resigned? It looks a very minor dip to me, in the context of the MOD's known difficulty in getting sufficient funding. I baled out of this earlier in the year, before the warning, on the grounds of the MOD's difficulties, but I am not sure now I should have done. I agree with you that 15 is looking a bit on the low side.
Jan 11 (Reuters) British defence contractor Ultra Electronics , which has warned of lower defence orders in the country, said on Thursday it had significant exposure to a rising U.S. defence budget, and had seen growing demand for advanced technologies.
The company, which makes military electronics for land, air and sea operations, also said it expects to have modest progress in 2018 underlying revenue and operating profit on a constant currency basis. ...
Shares of Ultra Electronice were up 13 percent at 1428 pence in early trading, making it the biggest percentage gainer on the FTSE Midcap Index Ultra Electronics said it had begun the new year with an order cover on expected revenue of about 62 percent, higher than about 56 percent in 2017.
"The board is confident that Ultra has sustainable operating trading momentum with a significant number of recent long-term contract wins," said Douglas Caster, Executive Chairman.
The company said order intake for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 was about 900 million pounds ($1.21 billion), adding it would recommend a final dividend of 35 pence per share.
The company said the search for a new chief executive was underway, after its last CEO quit in November as Britain's government scaled back business with the defence contractor. ...
Funding pressure on the Ministry of Defence has forced it to pause, cancel or delay several programmes and "within the last few weeks a number of our UK orders budgeted for 2017 have been affected," Ultra Electronics said in November.
Ultra Electronics' new chief will be looking to tap U.S. President Donald Trump's promised $700 billion in defence spending. The U.S. accounts for 50 percent of the company's revenue, while UK accounts for 24 percent.
I hadn't expected this after the November statement, but you can never got too many trading updates! And it says things are in line with the November statement, but there is a little more detail given.
Incoming orders have been strong with £900m in v sales of £770m, so we have an increased order book at year end.
They are raising the dividend, albeit modestly, and companies facing Armageddon don't do that, so it shows confidence that this UK blip is likely to be a short term blip only.
Operating profit this year will be just under £120m. last year it was just under £90m, so a 33% rise. That's not bad is it? Admittedly the number of shares has increased, but only by 10%. So last year's EPS was around 83. A 33% increase in earnings and a 10% increase in shares would give us an EPS around 100 - a PE of 12.5.
Full year dividend is likely to be 49.6
2018 is likely to show modest improvement on 2017 (although it's early stages.)
So I think a business growing modestly with a good international coverage & a PE around 12.5 & yield of nearly 4% merits a weak buy recommendation.
"the pay review body for the MP's independent and watch as they give them a massive pay rise."
I don't see why we have to pay for this very expensive independent review of MPs salaries every year or whatever it is. It would be a lot simpler if they applied a set factor to average earnings which HMRC could produce easily enough. Use the same factor each year. Multiply average earnings by the factor - that's the MPs salary. If the MPs do a good job of running the economy average earnings would go up, so would the MPs salaries - fair and simple. And if we really wanted to see MPs fight for the people they represent than each MP's salary would be pegged to the average earnings of their constituents!
"but be reassured they are concentrating on important things like putting the cost of a cup of coffee up 5p."
HB -- correct, and they are doing nothing about business rates which fleeces most premises based businesses . They are also doing nothing about building houses for the public sector - 55,000 in 2010 and 5800 in 2016 -- they just don't give a monkey's.
They are happy to call the pay review body for the MP's independent and watch as they give them a massive pay rise.
I sound like a socialist all of a sudden -- not so but the Tory lot don't inspire confidence.
I think they might get wiped out at the next election.
Well found Games, but this is nothing new - it is exactly the reason for the profit warning in November. This Government is dithering on all major things - like defence budgets or Fox's take over of Sky - but be reassured they are concentrating on important things like putting the cost of a cup of coffee up 5p.
One would have thought the announcement of winning £26m of new contracts would lift the shares a bit - it may be small fry - only 3% of annual turnover - but still nice to see that customers have not lost faith with the company the way shareholders have.
The amount of director buying going on, gives me reassurance to top up more at these levels. Another case of markets over reacting to some not so good news, Just short of targets so share price falls by 20%. Overcooked!
"More director buys." Yes & another fund taking up upping its stake.
"Spartan hurdle cleared." As I read it I think it is one hurdle has been cleared but there is still another regulatory one before the deal can go forward.
An impression I get about the way markets react to good or bad news these days is (in my opinion) best explained by the rise in technical trading - the number of people - not just private traders, but brokers too - who trade share with no knowledge of what the company does or what news affects it. They love to see momentum and all jump on the bandwagon when they see it. What this tends to do, in my view, is when a company announces bad news, the share price goes down, and keeps on going down way past its sensible level. (The converse is true with good news.) This should give people who understand the true value of a share a big advantage in being able to buy something cheap and sell expensive.
Invesco & Legal & General have both increased their stake (or taken a stake.) As their holding before this (if they had one) was below the notifiable threshold, we don't know how big a buy their recent one was.
And another director buy today - only £20k, but even Directors of PLCs don't all have wads of readies to shell out at any moment's notice, so it is still positive.
I'm waiting till it stops going down and shows some sign of recovery before I join them.
Following our new CEO (ex chairman, ex CEO) splashing his cash yesterday, we've got he FD & a NED buying today - not so much, but £10k % £25k are still buys; and they wouldn't be doing that if they thought the business was on the way out.
"But since the highs in March, we've lost for getting on 50% of the value; but turnover will be only 4% down on last year, and profits will be up (according to this morning's trading update) and we have an experienced MD with a wealth of history within the company. The fall must be overdone. "
You could well be right, but I think comparing SP fall with a single year forecast revenue or profit fall is too narrow a comparison. The valuation is market's view of the profitability over a number of years with whatever growth is factored in. After Friday and Monday's the debacle and downgrade, I would think the growth expectations will take a hit, it will be interesting to watch for changes in future year EPS forecasts. 4-traders have a good summary (these are the reported numbers not the much higher up adjusted figures).
I sold all yesterday and took the hit, I don't feel comfortable holding given the risk of further bad news, but of course I could be wrong, the forward orders sounded encouraging but that is jam tomorrow with no guarantee.
Re Doug Castor's purchase, he bought 8160 shares, adding to his 300,000 holding, ~2.7%. A positive sign but hardly overwhelming. Arguably it would add sufficient support to the SP to pay for itself.
Good luck to those who are holding, you may well be proved right, I'll watch from the sidelines for now.
Important message from the Financial Conduct Authority:
Posting inside information that is not public knowledge, or information that is false or misleading, may constitute market abuse.
This could lead to an unlimited fine and up to seven years in prison.
If you have any information, concerns or queries about market abuse, click here.
The content of the messages posted represents the opinions of the author, and does not represent the opinions of Interactive Investor Trading Limited or its affiliates and has not been approved or issued by Interactive Investor Trading Limited.
You should be aware that the other participants of the above discussion group are strangers to you and may make statements which may be misleading, deceptive or wrong.
Please remember that the value of investments or income from them may go down as well as up and that the past performance of an investment is not a guide to its performance in the future.
The discussion boards on this site are intended to be an information sharing forum and is not intended to address your particular requirements.
Whilst information provided on them can help with your investment research you need to consider carefully whether you should make (or refraining from making) investment or other decisions based on what you see without doing further research on investments you are interested in.
Participating in this forum cannot be a substitute for obtaining advice from an appropriate expert independent adviser who takes into account your circumstances and specific investment needs in selected investments that are appropriate for you.