Metalrax: the numbers
To recap: Metalrax makes baking trays, pallet trucks and other prosaic things out of metal. It’s the kind of unexciting business that actually is exciting to value investors because of the absence of hype, hyperbole and high prices. Metalrax appears to dominate its bakewear niche, which is a good thing, but that hasn’t protected its profits, which is bad. I suspect it overspent on expansion just as the credit crunch hit, which increased costs as profits collapsed, forcing it to close or sell many of its businesses below book value, and write-off some of the value of those it retained. If that’s true, and the shrinking is coming to an end, Metalrax could be in a position to grow again. If it does, the low valuations are too pessimistic. The key numbers (above right) from Metalrax's preliminary results published last month and previous annual reports confirm the it looks cheap. Based on the 10 year earnings yield, the current price offers investors a return of 11% in a typical year assuming Metalrax can sustain the 9% return on equity its achieved in the past (here’s an explanation of that calculation). Since adjusted ROE was 9% in 2010, a year in which the company dramatically improved its performance, Metalrax could be coming back to life after a loss-making 2009. The statistical evidence for recovery last year is reinforced by its maximum F_Score of nine out of nine, showing that every one of the nine basic accounting signals employed were positive or improving. Metalrax was profitable (return on assets was 2.9%). Cash profits were positive too, by a healthier margin and Metalrax reduced its long-term debt in relation to total assets. Although the headline figures are positive, it’s clear from the charts that 2007, 2008 and 2009 were cataclysmic for Metalrax. The company’s book value declined from about £50m to under £20m and including dividends the last four years has wiped out all of the wealth Metalrax earned for investors between 2001 and 2006 (orange bars). In terms of book value, Metalrax is a much smaller company than it was even in 2001. It’s also more indebted (blue bars). Apart from current liabilities, which are covered by current assets. Metalrax owes just under £8m to the bank, £5m to its pension fund and, unrecorded on the balance sheet and therefore not reflected in my charts, it owes about £5m in future payments mostly to landlords on uncancellable property leases. The total value of the company’s assets is now three times the value of equity, which means the company is mostly funded by debt of one kind of another. The curious thing is, if you’d looked at Metalrax in 2006, you’d have seen a company that had grown shareholder wealth over the previous six years, and little debt. It had the makings of a good investment, but it wasn’t. It’s share price fell from around 100p to below 10p in 2010. Those qualities were ephemeral, though, and the argument for investing in Metalrax now, when the figures are, on the face of it, worse, is:
- The scale of the share price decline is so much greater than the decline in the company’s book value it suggests investors were over optimistic about Metalrax in 2006 and may be overly pessimistic now.
- After all the write-offs and asset sales, the company’s book value is probably much more accurate now.
- Judging by its return to profitability, it looks like the company is turning around.
The return to profitability is not unequivocally good news, though, because Metalrax is achieving it with more leverage (borrowing) than in the past. At 2% its profit margins are low, and well below the 5% median it achieved over the decade, or the high of 10% in 2004. There’s a rosy way of looking at these statistics, and a jaundiced way. The rosy view is that profit margins will recover and now the company is more leveraged, that will mean return on equity rises above its long-term average. But Metalrax is in a very competitive market and a hostage to steel and energy prices so the jaundiced view is lower profit margins are permanent and we’re left with a riskier company because of its indebtedness. The directors were very keen buyers at 4p and less exuberant buyers at 8p. Now the shares are nearer 12p they may still good be good value but the case is more finely balanced. A lot depends on management’s intentions, which means it’s probably time to read the fluffier parts of the annual reports. A brief note on the charts: You may have noticed I’m charting some new statistics. FCFROE is Free Cash Flow Return on Equity, and I’ve subdivided NAV ps into Tangible Net Asset Value per share (TNAV ps) and Goodwill ps. It’s probably worth noting that 41% of Metalrax’s reduced equity is goodwill, which, as we’ve seen can just evaporate. The good news is Metalrax did not write any goodwill off in 2010, so perhaps the write-offs have ended. I’ve also included adjusted net profit/sales (profit margins), and sales/assets (asset turn) on the chart that formerly included only assets/equity (leverage or gearing). These are the components of return on equity, and by tracking them I can see more clearly how Metalrax is earning a return (currently by employing increased leverage).
About the author
Richard is companies editor of Interactive Investor and a columnist at Money Observer magazine. A keen private investor through his Self Invested Personal Pension, he manages two virtual portfolios. The Share Sleuth portfolio is a hand-picked collection of mostly small-cap value shares, while the Nifty Thrifty is a mechanical portfolio designed to pick large, successful companies at cheap prices.
Richard Beddard's tweets
- MT @theredcorner66 25 years later, ... @HowardSchilit: Significant Changes Proposed in Lease Accounting http://t.co/052WlwGbIx — 4 days 11 hours ago
- MT @ExpectingValue: Greggs - http://t.co/0JTMAwBYnb - winds up to an interesting conclusion. Comments are excellent to. — 4 days 15 hours ago
- Wondering whether Ultra Electronics' 180 niches are worth 15 times earnings: http://t.co/Mwcf3AW7B4 — 5 days 14 hours ago
- MT @Stockopedia: Part 3 - Howard Marks http://t.co/sFIe3VZouk: People tend to believe stories which, if true will make them rich. — 6 days 16 hours ago
- Summon Denison-Smith - articulate bear case first: http://t.co/mpD81JpG3t < from @paulypilot — 1 week 16 hours ago
- Barel Karsan
- Expecting Value
- Gannon on Investing
- Mark Carter
- Musings on Markets
- My Investing Notebook
- Oddball Stocks
- Peston's Picks
- Philip O'Sullivan
- Seth's Posterous
- The Value Perspective
- Turnkey Analyst
- UK Value Investor
- Value Stock Inquisition
|Bid / Ask||/|
|Last Update: ()|