<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>Elektron Discussion</title>
<description>Elektron Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9657799</guid>
<title>Re:</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Surprised at you yoyoy ! By Spectrum7 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9657799&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Spectrum7</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9656624</guid>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[ Yawn. By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9656624&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9656208</guid>
<title>Re: genuine debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Its got absolutely nothing to do with genuine debate and you know it.<br>
This looks like a get out clause should people insist on some answers to some very serious questions..<br>
This started with the end of the PR dept and KD changing his email address and not communicating with share holders. This addition to the rules is just another brick in the wall he has built round himself to deflect criticism and honest demands for answers !<br>
I am amazed you still have the front to show up here binjiou<br>
Shareholders will demand some answers at the meeting and if they dont get them then they WILL call another meeting and people WILL be held to account. By Spectrum7 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9656208&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Spectrum7</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9652998</guid>
<title>genuine debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Stephen-It is presumably there to pre empt a possible attempt to disrupt the meeting. Depending on your viewpoint , it could be seen as either cautious , or paranoid , but I don`t think they want to stifle genuine debate . By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9652998&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9652754</guid>
<title>Re: Genuine debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[ binjiou<br>
<br>
Why was this paragraph put in the AGM notice then? It's not there just to fill out the page.<br>
<br>
I've never seen anything like this before. By Stephen Maturin ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9652754&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen Maturin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9652721</guid>
<title>Re: Genuine debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Can someone please show me another company that has said that?<br>
<br>
tiger By CASTLEFORD TIGER ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9652721&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>CASTLEFORD TIGER</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9652524</guid>
<title>Genuine debate</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Stephen---Your comment is unworthy . There is nothing in the statement  that suggests management want to suppress genuine debate. By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9652524&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9650685</guid>
<title>Suppression Of Free Speech By EKT</title>
<description><![CDATA[ It looks like the EKT directors are going to suppress debate on the legitimate shareholder concerns at the AGM. This is from the Notice Of The AGM issued today ........<br>
<br>
&quot;However, without prejudice to any other power which he may have under these Articles or at common law, the Chairman may, without the need for the consent of the meeting, interrupt or<br>
adjourn any meeting from time to time and from place to place or for an indefinite period if he is of the opinion that it has become necessary to do so in order to secure the proper and orderly conduct of the meeting or to give all persons entitled to do so a reasonable opportunity of attending, speaking and voting at the meeting or to ensure that the business of the meeting is properly disposed of&#146;.&quot;<br>
<br>
Basically - &quot;shut up &amp; pay up, WE are in charge NOT shareholders&quot;<br>
<br>
What an appalling action in a modern, democratic country. Perhaps KD has been watching the new Dictator movie by sasha Baron-Cohen By Stephen Maturin ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9650685&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen Maturin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9624182</guid>
<title>Speachless</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Spec---Speachless ?   In your case unlikely. By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9624182&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9621706</guid>
<title>Re: Stephen</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Precisely.--So most posting, far from embodying useful predictions, are merely commentaries on what has happened ; wise after the event, and of little use.<br>
<br>
Speachless !! without a crystal ball what else can you base a prediction on other than recent  game changing events ? Analysts , brokers, even MM's base all their thoughts on yesterdays news which may well give a clue to future news. Come on Binjiou this is basic stuff. By Spectrum7 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9621706&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Spectrum7</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9617427</guid>
<title>Stephen</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Precisely.--So most posting, far from embodying  useful predictions, are merely commentaries on what has happened ; wise after the event, and of little use. By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9617427&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9617354</guid>
<title>Re: Binjiou The Eejit</title>
<description><![CDATA[ &quot;You have changed your tune now&quot;<br>
<br>
Of course I have! The December quotation of mine that you highlighted was written -<br>
- BEFORE the 2nd EKT profits warning in 2 months;<br>
- BEFORE the announcement of the JSOP shares land grab by the executive directors;<br>
- BEFORE the really lousy FY2012 figures;<br>
- BEFORE it became apparent that the company saving new products (due in Q4) were running very late, and may have completey vanished;<br>
- BEFORE the patronising attempts by Simon Acland to defend the indefensible.<br>
<br>
When the facts change my opinion changes By Stephen Maturin ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9617354&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stephen Maturin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9616952</guid>
<title>About to initiate a new trend</title>
<description><![CDATA[ EKT.L has closed below the lower band by 8.1%. Although price has broken the lower band and a downside breakout is possible; the most likely direction for EKT.L is to continue within current trading range. It is unclear right now based on current numbers. 44.4% narrower than normal. The narrow width of the bands suggests low volatility as compared to EKT.L's normal range. The bands have been in this narrow range for 10 bars. This is a sign that the market may be about to initiate a new trend. <br>
<br>
Check here:<br>
'<A HREF="http://uk.stoxline.com/q_uk.php?s=ekt" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://uk.stoxline.com/q_uk.php?s=ekt')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://uk.stoxline.com/q_uk.php?s=ekt</A>' By doudaibk ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9616952&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>doudaibk</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9616936</guid>
<title>CT</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ALL investors have been let down , but this has been said before,---ad nauseum. By binjiou ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9616936&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>binjiou</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9616022</guid>
<title>Binj</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Not sure if i  am included in the &quot;losers club&quot; but i will have my say.<br>
<br>
The big investors/ Barry/Nick etc have been badly let down.<br>
<br>
Nick was asked an opinion about JSOP and gave it. It was ignored.<br>
I was given the infomation from KD and my comments were ignored.<br>
<br>
Via a NED i tried to express to the BOD that i thought this scheme was TOO generous. I was ignored.<br>
<br>
Several e mails later with various members ( and no real falling out) i decided to sell the majority of my shares.<br>
<br>
This i did (which upset) some of the group. However i lost faith in the BOD.<br>
I agree the shares are toxic now...............however i also think the warnings and slow down are all &quot; stage managed&quot; and even if there is no recovery in the world you will get the BOD talking these up come the right time.<br>
<br>
I for one will vote against the NED`s both have failed us ( not sure who is due up yet) and KD.<br>
<br>
I am also not sure if the pop about holding was also aimed at me? If so please feel free i am a big boy.<br>
tiger By CASTLEFORD TIGER ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:EKT.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9616022&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>CASTLEFORD TIGER</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

