<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>JJB Sports Discussion</title>
<description>JJB Sports Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259721</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Blimey. By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259721&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259614</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Im getting ants in my pants now to be honest, Together with Duck I share the belief and have done for a while that Feb is the month that something is going to happen. 1/4 through....nothing yet!<br>
<br>
BB - Thanks for this....I didnt think of the smaller companies so I will look into it. By Young Maverick ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259614&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Young Maverick</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259552</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ YM - Yes I agree if JJB can prove it has turned around then perhaps 40p plus is possible and I agree there are signs this might be happening. Exceptionals aside, it might already have happened. But I believe what Duck is saying is that a takeover at 40p plus is feasible even though JJB won't be able to turn itself around. <br>
<br>
I am not for a second dismissing Duck - he is a very intelligent poster who knows far more than I do. But I don't get it....so am inclined not to buy it, although I am happy to accept this might well reflect a lack of understanding on my part. Naturally I hope he is right, since on his view we can expect a massive hike in the price shortly! On mine who knows when, if ever, it will come.<br>
<br>
One thing is for sure, if Duck sells his stake into this market I don't think we will be wondering why we aren't at 5p anymore! <br>
<br>
How we laughed! All the best, TM By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259552&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259426</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ YM, Sorry you are incorrect when you stated  &quot;SPD is the only competition&quot;<br>
<br>
Dont think SD are the only company who have been stealing market share from jjb over recent years. Suggest you go to companies house and do some research on Pro Direct Soccer and have a look at how the business has boomed in the years JJB have been suffering.<br>
<br>
IMO &amp; DYOR By BoyBlunder1 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259426&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BoyBlunder1</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259420</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Well Duck, I hope things kick off here before you depart. It would be a shame to leave just as things are getting interesting. (Although I guess depends on precisely how they get interesting!) Good luck anyway, TM By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259420&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9259176</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ TM, all I can tell you with certainty is that Henderson held 866,216 JJB shares on August 5 2010, which was then a whopping 0.13% of the shares in issue. I'm fairly sure they haven't issued any holdings RNS's so we can safely assume that their disposal would have had a minor/temporary effect on the SP back in November.<br>
<br>
As for the propriety of a pre-arranged deal, I don't have much faith in the disclosure and transparency regulations. I also suspect that it would be possible, by judicious wording, to weasel their way around the regulations, by saying, eg: if the company is still trading in Feb 2012 and if the share price is 30% below, we would be prepared to buy the business at 45p per share, as long as the Queen is still alive. In other words, it could be a binding agreement but so contorted and conditional as to make it debatable whether it would be prudent to disclose it.<br>
<br>
Anyhoo, I've backed my theory and I won't be hanging around for much longer to test yours. By Duck and Dive ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9259176&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Duck and Dive</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9258938</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ in light of the Jan Sales data, I really wonder how JJB did on LfL. As they had a dire Jan last year right? And they didnt discount heavily through out Jan.<br>
<br>
Whats the verdict team? Did they manage to beat last year? I think they have. But if they have then why not release a RNS?<br>
<br>
Ifs and buts eh. Trading is a game of chess By Young Maverick ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9258938&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Young Maverick</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9258879</guid>
<title>Re: 170,000 BUY</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Better get the FSA onto it then YM. :-)<br>
<br>
Seriously though, one of the problems with thinly traded stocks is the bid/offer quoted by organisations like iii can be way out. So it is nigh on impossible to tell what is a buy and what is a sell. I agree the 170,000 trade LOOKS LIKE a buy. That doesn't guarantee anything though and as for the other trades..... who knows?<br>
<br>
IMVHO By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9258879&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9258878</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ TM - however someone would pay 40p + for a company that has turned itself around and has come back to profitability which I believe JJB are on the verge of doing later this year. (H2)<br>
<br>
If another party thinks we are going to come back to profitablity, that they having backing of key suppliers that dont want an SPD monopoly in the market, and that they can add to the JJB offering and chop and change it to make it better (e.g another bigger sports retailer Dickk's/JD/etc etc) then I don't see why they wouldnt pay 40p +.<br>
<br>
However I also dont see why JJB would not be able to carry out with a successful turn around? Why not? They gearing more toward web sales and minimising their brick and mortar. They have experience board members. SPD is the only competition, and lets face it they are successful but they are not serious about sport. There is market for them. I firmly believe it.<br>
<br>
 By Young Maverick ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9258878&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Young Maverick</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9258770</guid>
<title>170,000 BUY</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Big buy, and there is some more big buying.<br>
<br>
Out of the Total Volume of 280k so far, around 270k are showinf as buys. And the SP still hasnt rocketed?<br>
<br>
WOW. I have to agree with Duck and state there is defo some manipulation on this stock. however to what extent im not sure about.<br>
<br>
Whats all this buying about now, the final tree shake and buying before some move?<br>
<br>
One would hope.! By Young Maverick ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9258770&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Young Maverick</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9257640</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..correction</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ...it makes sense to me that JD might pay a small sum to grab....<br>
<br>
 By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9257640&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9257629</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Duck, perhaps you are right that my view is too simple - or more importantly, wrong - but I don't think we are talking a huge number of shares here. Do we know how many shares Henderson owned? Less than 3% though. Could these not have been drip fed into the market over a period of a month..... or a few months? Given the number of shares it might have looked like PI trades.<br>
<br>
I just can't tell but perhaps you can.<br>
<br>
I guess I am also unconvinced by the pre-arranged buy out argument. It implies an awful lot of manipulation and deceit on the part of the company and major shareholders IMVHO, and if I have understood you correctly all of whom might be subject to legal sanction if discovered. It makes sense to me that JJB might pay a small sum to grab JJB some time close to potential administration but 40p now implies a market cap over &pound;100m. The fact that the last placing price was 40p is barely relevant I think. Absolutely noone in business is going to pay over &pound;100m for a company which is likely to go bust without a seriously compelling strategic reason (like IAG buying BMI for its Heathrow slots), which I don't see here.<br>
<br>
So having written all this I would say the most likely &quot;game&quot; afoot is the one that is out in the open. JJB, its managers and sharholders are here because they want to take a stab at turning this business around and making it sustainably profitable. That is what they have said they are doing and I can still see no compelling evidence to suggest the need for a deeper theory.<br>
<br>
Listen to what the company is telling us..... I have heard that somewhere before. Might be worth trying now!? ;-) IMVHO. WTFDIK By The Millipede ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9257629&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Millipede</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9256354</guid>
<title>Jan retail sales "returned to reality"</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9064556/Shoppers-cut-back-in-January-after-Christmas-splurge.html" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9064556/Shoppers-cut-back-in-January-after-Christmas-splurge.html')" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9064556/Shoppers-cut-back-in-January-after-Christmas-splurge.html</A> By Duck and Dive ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9256354&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Duck and Dive</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9256218</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Hey BB, yes i exited SPD with a 15% profit on top of my investment about a month ago. I used the funds to buy more into JJB.<br>
<br>
Nonetheless there is still a lot of money to be made in SPD and I can see 300p this year but Mike Ashley does worry me at times and hence I thought best to take profit and reinvest in a riskier share that may give me 100%+ return; namely JJB.<br>
<br>
I dont know what JJB are upto to be honest guys....there a lot of potential theories - all I know is that the sooner the SP lifts to 20p+ I will be a very very happy man. By Young Maverick ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9256218&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Young Maverick</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9255983</guid>
<title>Re: This Week.,..</title>
<description><![CDATA[ LOL<br>
<br>
basket case By here and now ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:JJB.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9255983&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>here and now</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

