<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>Proteome Sciences Discussion</title>
<description>Proteome Sciences Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9658258</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ BC2K - unfortunately markets have deteriorated very quickly, and are in danger of a major fall. It isnt guranteed, but it is now looking a very real possibility, and if it plays out all stocks will take a hit.<br>
<br>
Events in the bond market are warning in a similar way preceeding the May 6th 2010 flash crash. AR By Andy Reilly ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9658258&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andy Reilly</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9653118</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Dave,<br>
<br>
I do not read a seven digit payment to prm in the license announcement now. It seems more to be the accumulated sum if and when all development goals and milestones are reached.<br>
My expectation is that prm received very little, and, consistent with previous statements, will claim that future milestones might be &quot;transformational&quot;...<br>
<br>
see the quote: &quot; ...Under the terms of the Agreement Randox will develop products for early diagnosis of stroke and subsequent monitoring of treatment outcomes. Financial terms provide Proteome Sciences with seven digit (US dollar) license and development milestones together with double digit royalties on sales....&quot;<br>
<br>
I am quite concerned about the current sp drop. <br>
<br>
BC2000 By Bluechip2000 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9653118&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bluechip2000</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9652770</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Hmmm... Let's see - &quot;the market cooling towards PRM&quot; and &quot;surely need a massive deal or two &quot;... are the two connected? By Waiting patiently ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9652770&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Waiting patiently</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9649754</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ The SP is certainly under pressure ahead of the results .Many speculative stocks are also under pressure with view to the general market uncertainty.<br>
It will be interesting to see what 7 figure sum($) was paid in respect of our recent stroke deal.Most of expect it to closer to 1 mill rather than closer to 10 mill &amp; hopefully all will be revealed with the results. By dave297 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9649754&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dave297</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9649367</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ tt - I am not sure whether your 'hold' rec is as a result of a more cautious approach, but clealy PRM still hasnt had that massive rerating you have suggested was likely. <br>
<br>
I think you will be lucky if your &pound;6M revenues projection of November last year plays out for 2012. It would surely need a massive deal or two to get near that, and currently the market seems to be cooling towards PRM prospects.<br>
<br>
The chart continues its negative bias, and on the 14th the SP failed to break back above 30.5p, and the 200 day moving average, which is now turning down. I know markets are gloomy, but its a very risk averse market currently. <br>
<br>
Lets hope more good news can come to the support of the SP soon, but its hard to imagine 2011 results will trigger any kind of rerating. AR By Andy Reilly ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9649367&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andy Reilly</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9637347</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <br>
Peter<br>
<br>
Yes, I say 'could' because Diagenic suggested that<br>
<br>
They are though of course potentially very biased and I've not found ANY independent source saying the same thing<br>
So it remains 'could'<br>
 By traumatek ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9637347&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>traumatek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9633341</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ MarkyMSoinc  <br>
<br>
You appear to have missed the point of my earlier post.<br>
<br>
I referred to The_Doctor's post (which was probably after he had bought back in again) and from which I quote::<br>
<br>
&quot;...... 72%  for early AD vs control could in reality equate to nearer 85 - 90%.&quot;<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
G. By Gruyeres ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9633341&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gruyeres</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9633047</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ low sensitivity and specificity from the results of ad1000 study sums it up I think... By MarkyMSoinc ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9633047&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MarkyMSoinc</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9632454</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ jotc - am I alone in not knowing what some poster on another site is claiming about PRM. Is it possible to summarize, without necessarily giving the view credence. If they are putting around untruths about the status of the co, rather than expressing an opinion, surely that is a legal matter for PRM. Thanks - AR By Andy Reilly ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9632454&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andy Reilly</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9632346</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I don't disagree re his ability to upset people.  IF what he is spouting is bull then the company should come out and correct, can't really see why no-one has posted a response.<br>
<br>
And have no idea what big guns mean and why there needs to be discretion.  Its all bit too much  grassy knoll for me.<br>
<br>
I By MarkyMSoinc ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9632346&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MarkyMSoinc</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9632031</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Yes...its off board. Are you surprised? He's upset a lot of people. This sort of dirty washing clearly needs to be done with a degree of discretion but I think its fair to say that the guns are big enough to get the job done. By Jackonthecoast ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9632031&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jackonthecoast</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9631296</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ MarkyMSonic.<br>
<br>
Admission of misleading info having earlier been posted came in post 15869 which indicated that PRM's spec/sens figures may indeed already be adequate.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
G. By Gruyeres ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9631296&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gruyeres</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9630428</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Which response ?  Is there something off board ? By MarkyMSoinc ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9630428&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MarkyMSoinc</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9630366</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ That is indeed who I'm referring to. As I said the response has not been widely circulated but I'm sure it will filter out in due course. As ever its up to each to do their own research. By Jackonthecoast ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9630366&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jackonthecoast</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9630266</guid>
<title>Re: Soap opera?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ You talking about the Doc jack.  Whilst he is definitely trading and his views could be considered to support that position not sure his analysis has been shot down, and even less sure who the big guns are.<br>
<br>
Suggest people take a look at advfn and make their own mind up.<br>
<br>
btw I am a holder for 12 years but not buying more at the mo. By MarkyMSoinc ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PRM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9630266&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MarkyMSoinc</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

