<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>Playtech Discussion</title>
<description>Playtech Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9559420</guid>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<description><![CDATA[ As you can see by today's big jump following the William Hill annnouncement that the online JV profits grew well in Q1, the market is really split, with the bulls saying that its a great growth story that keeps on increasing profits, and the bears worried about Sagi's meddling and dodgy deals.<br>
<br>
I just don't see the logic of having to take out loans to pay Sagi early, and only securing a 5% discount. Surely they must be paying some interest on the loans - 3 or 4%? Also the announcement was very vague about the social media acquisitions - which normally some business case for the acquisition is laid out, like revenues of the company to be acquired, user base, etc. By Boony ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9559420&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Boony</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9546181</guid>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <A HREF="http://t.co/hv4krq0X" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://t.co/hv4krq0X<br>')" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/hv4krq0X<br></A>
<br>
Yep, they don't like Sagi selling to himself as per boony's post. <br>
<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9546181&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9545420</guid>
<title>Re:</title>
<description><![CDATA[ nev1jol / boony,<br>
<br>
still not sure why the sp fell so much - if this aquisition was made a while ago but the payment for it has been bought forward (and a discount included) why the drop? Is it solely because the city doesn't like Sagi owning the company he is also selling to? Or is it because the payment is being made via  a loan rather than any cash reserves?<br>
<br>
Unfortunately I lost quite a bit today on this - would have been worse but my stop-losses!<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9545420&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9544968</guid>
<title></title>
<description><![CDATA[ good news about the main listing, possible more II investors and that may limit Sagi. maybe that's why deals are being done now. By nev1jol ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9544968&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nev1jol</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9544496</guid>
<title>Re: Wow! What a drop!</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Read carefully. Not a purchase. Just bringing forward payment milestones. It stinks of poor corporate governance - as the money is essentially going to Teddy Sagi. He's treating Playtech like his personal bank account. Note the &quot;social media&quot; acquisitions announced today - Teddy's also involved, and going to financially benefit from the acquisitions.<br>
<br>
Its the reason why Playtech trades at such low valuations even though its a good growth stock with potential. Without the Teddy Sagi cloud, it could easily be at forward P/Es of 15-20.<br>
<br>
 By Boony ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9544496&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Boony</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9543904</guid>
<title>Wow! What a drop!</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Did I miss something here? Does anyone know why the SP dropped so  much after the purchase of PTTS?<br>
<br>
Is it because the purchase is from Sagi?<br>
<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9543904&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9492757</guid>
<title>PTEC Shortlisted for Greek lottery?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Heard that PTEC are one of three or four companies shortlisted to provide IT to a Greek gaming / lottery company. Not sure if this is good or bad!<br>
<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9492757&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9439217</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ The results were impressive, but i'm still unsure why Playtech commands such a high market valuation in comparison to it's peers relative to profits - bwin.prty and 888. Does anyone know? By Largey ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9439217&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Largey</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9435092</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ fair dink.um By Bantam Spirit ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9435092&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bantam Spirit</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9434782</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I should have said, this is based on spread betting. I sold at the rise this morning and bought back in at the dip.<br>
<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9434782&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9434447</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Go Dink ...Uhhhh? Very strange strategy! By Bantam Spirit ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9434447&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bantam Spirit</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9433557</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Excellent results and the share price drops. I sold out this morning but with a view to getting back into Playtech - last time I sat on a loss for a couple of weeks after the results so thought I'd lock in some profits this time.<br>
<br>
GD By Go Dink ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9433557&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Go Dink</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9433094</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Excelent start to the days trading. By oldjoe1 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9433094&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>oldjoe1</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9432940</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ PTEC Playtech <br>
<br>
The icing on the cake <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Current trading <br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
Playtech has experienced a strong start to the year enjoying healthy momentum across its operations including those it has acquired recently. The Directors are especially encouraged by the performance of PTTS, where trading is significantly above management expectations.<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
Like-for-like growth in daily average revenues for the first nine weeks of 2012 are up over 23% compared to the same period in 2011. The daily average revenues versus Q4 2011 on the same basis are over 3% ahead<br>
 By oldjoe1 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9432940&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>oldjoe1</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9432922</guid>
<title>Re: PLAYTECH RESULTS THURSDAY....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <br>
<br>
Financial highlights<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Gross income* up 41% to &#128;243.6 million (2010: &#128;173.1 million) <br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Total revenues up by 46% to &#128;207.5 million (2010: &#128;142.3 million)<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Adjusted EBITDA** increased by 22% to &#128;125.5 million (2010: &#128;103.1 million) <br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Adjusted net profit** increased by 21% to &#128;112.8 million (2010: &#128;93.2 million)<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Net cash balances*** at year end of &#128;137.3 million (2010: &#128;68.5 million) following a &pound;100 million fundraising in December, providing new capital to support joint ventures in newly regulated markets, and funding of targeted acquisitions <br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Adjusted basic EPS** of 46.2 &#128; cents per share (2010: 38.5 &#128; cents per share)<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
&sect; Recommended combined interim and final dividend for 2011 of 16.5 &#128; cents per share<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
* Gross income is defined as total revenue plus the Group's income from associate<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
** Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS and adjusted net profit are calculated after adding back certain non-cash charges, cash expenses relating to professional costs on acquisitions, legal costs relating to litigation with William Hill and prior year taxes (see reconciliation in Financial and Operating Overview below)<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
*** Net cash balances defined as cash and cash equivalents less bank borrowings<br>
<br>
 <br>
<br>
 By oldjoe1 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:PTEC.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9432922&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>oldjoe1</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

