<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>Royal Bank of Scotland Group (The) PLC Discussion</title>
<description>Royal Bank of Scotland Group (The) PLC Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554581</guid>
<title>Re: HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ GatorHex,<br>
<br>
If you check my posts from Friday, there is another nice wee 300million job in there.<br>
<br>
RBS are bust, utterly, completely &amp; will eventually flounder. By skin_flint ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554581&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>skin_flint</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554498</guid>
<title>Re: LBG Better Position to Recover That RBS</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Sell RBS &amp; buy LLOY. By nest-egg ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554498&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nest-egg</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554497</guid>
<title>LBG Better Position to Recover That RBS</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <A HREF="http://www.researchrecap.com/index.php/2009/11/05/lloyds-banking-group-better-positioned-to-recover-than-rbs/" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.researchrecap.com/index.php/2009/11/05/lloyds-banking-group-better-positioned-to-recover-than-rbs/')" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.researchrecap.com/index.php/2009/11/05/lloyds-banking-group-better-positioned-to-recover-than-rbs/</A> By nest-egg ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554497&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nest-egg</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554477</guid>
<title>Re: Lloyds investors urged to take actio...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ According to the III video on RBS ,,, RBS has assests worth 'trillions of dollars'.. when RBS recovers I am sure it can buy xtrata if it wanted with some lose change in its vault. By trader98 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554477&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>trader98</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554321</guid>
<title>Re: conumdrum</title>
<description><![CDATA[ An intriguing thought just occurred to me.<br>
<br>
CTT 06-04-09 &quot;just bought 100k&quot; <br>
<br>
how did you get on? did you manage to get out before suspension? By GatorHex ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554321&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GatorHex</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554308</guid>
<title>Re: HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ You wouldn't get out fast enough anyway because the shares would drop too quickly because the big money can get out faster.<br>
<br>
<br>
Oh really? If this bank goes bust, the shares will be suspended. THEN what will you get?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Nothing - a la B&amp; B following a rights issue. By Old Jonas ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554308&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Old Jonas</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554273</guid>
<title>Re: Lloyds investors urged to take actio...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Xstrata has mining and mineral assets that are much in demand.<br>
<br>
Lloyds just has vault full of paper IOUs <br>
<br>
<img src="/i/discussions/emoticons/big-grin.gif"> By GatorHex ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554273&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GatorHex</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554264</guid>
<title>Re: Lloyds investors urged to take action</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Yeah this does happen, look at xstrata after the rights it dropped to about &pound;2.80, but look at it now.<br>
<br>
I guess people might have to tail swallow.<br>
<br>
But after people will pile in with the money for the cheap shares, so there could be an opportunity there.<br>
<br>
Although this is the RBS BB so whats your post doing here? By Painkiller ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554264&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Painkiller</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554247</guid>
<title>Re: HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ &quot;Oh really? If this bank goes bust, the shares will be suspended. THEN what will you get? &quot;<br>
<br>
Oh thanks for that, you just reminded me of another penny stock lender that everyone was told they should buy before it rockets to the moon!<br>
<br>
Cattles <br>
<A HREF="http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:CTT.L&amp;display=discussion" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:CTT.L&amp;display=discussion<br>')" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:CTT.L&amp;display=discussion<br></A>
<br>
LOL, I told people not to buy it, they never listen! <img src="/i/discussions/emoticons/big-grin.gif"> By GatorHex ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554247&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GatorHex</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554197</guid>
<title>Re: HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET...</title>
<description><![CDATA[ The shareprice will never go to zero because the decisions are often made out of the blue before traders can even react.<br>
<br>
You wouldn't get out fast enough anyway because the shares would drop too quickly because the big money can get out faster.<br>
<br>
<br>
Oh really? If this bank goes bust, the shares will be suspended. THEN what will you get? By skin_flint ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554197&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>skin_flint</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554174</guid>
<title>Re: Re:offmerocker</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Anyone that can put two and two together can clearly see that:<br>
<br>
a) Without government intervention then RBS would have been long gone by now<br>
<br>
b) If RBS don't perform in the future then it is practically a certainty that nationalisation is their destiny<br>
<br>
Therefore I am wondering what your point is GatorHex when you mention the bailout.  The key point now is to discern whether RBS can perform in the future.  Now as far as I'm concerned I see positivity in the new approach to RBS' strategy in moving forward.  Hester has laid out his cards on the table and allowed the shareholers to make their minds up, and it seems that the shareholders want to back this bank because they know that the future rewards in the timescale of two-three years outweighs the risks.  The books are beginning to balance and that is what counts at this stage.  I personally believe that as long as RBS can drum up enough business and investment when moving forward then they will be successful in living on. By mReRocker ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554174&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mReRocker</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554161</guid>
<title>Lloyds investors urged to take action</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Lloyds investors urged to take action <br>
By Steve Lodge <br>
<br>
Published: November 6 2009 19:39 | Last updated: November 6 2009 19:39<br>
<br>
Shareholders in Lloyds Banking Group should either buy new shares in the bank&#146;s &pound;13.5bn rights issue or sell out altogether, according to private-client stock brokers.<br>
<br>
Investors who do not top up their holdings in the record capital-raising that was announced this week could see the value of their existing shares shrink to an &#147;uneconomic&#148; few hundred pounds, they warn.<br>
<br>
read on<br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cde5a970-cb09-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cde5a970-cb09-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html')" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cde5a970-cb09-11de-97e0-00144feabdc0.html</A> <br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
 By sorass ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554161&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sorass</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554063</guid>
<title>Re: conumdrum</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Steady on Shaggy,<br>
<br>
It was that type of mathematical modeling that got us into this mess in the first place. By knellerwoman ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554063&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>knellerwoman</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554050</guid>
<title>Re: Darling warns RBS may need money</title>
<description><![CDATA[ shame on you--that article was from last wednesday <img src="/i/discussions/emoticons/angry.gif"> By terribletim ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554050&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>terribletim</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5554046</guid>
<title>Re: conumdrum</title>
<description><![CDATA[ do we have &pound;337bn of toxic assets wrapped inside a toxic asset<br>
************************<br>
<br>
i think the two cancel each other out ie two minuses make a plus<br>
<br>
thus rbs = good. By Shaggy Do ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:RBS.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5554046&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Shaggy Do</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
