Stanelco PLC Discussion Board http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion http://www.iii.co.uk/icons/logos/uk_logo.gif http://www.iii.co.uk tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6108132 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6108132&action=detail Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:30:00 GMT CityLifeIsHype tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6107823 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6107823&action=detail Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:34:00 GMT desertwolf01 tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6107730 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6107730&action=detail Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:49:00 GMT maestr0 tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6107328
By Ace08 ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6107328&action=detail Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:16:00 GMT Ace08 tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6107327
AFC is flying (he tipped it at 2p ) 1200% up, shame he sits on this rubbish .

Sikovace move on you dummy , Ace is best By Ace08 ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6107327&action=detail Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:03:00 GMT Ace08 tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105914 The selling of the RF division could be a possibility although it is pretty steady and was historically the core of the business.

I don't think selling RF would get anywhere near what they will have to pay for the converter and I think that will be a placement with a couple of insti's at preferable rates [whether the PI will get shafted during this I don't know but highly suspect]. By sikovace ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105914&action=detail Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:35:00 GMT sikovace tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105908 If previous years results had been reported at the end of April that would make perfect sense but to 'pull' the year end results one week before they were due and to shunt all other dates back doesn't make sense unless there is a specific reason.

I couldn't agree more about the disrespect shown to share holders.That will come back to bite them hard.It is quite clear to me that PI's are deemed dispensable and they would be quite happy to burn away all existing share holders.
By sikovace ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105908&action=detail Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:30:00 GMT sikovace tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105825
Perhaps I can shed some light on the results position.

I am on the board of a PLC and the auditing process for year-end is a nightmare. Our year-end finishes 31 Dec and we will not publish the results and annual report until the end of April. Not only does the auditing take some time, we then have to sort out the report, printing etc...

I am not saying this is definately the reason for these being late, rather than it being a very plausible one.

As for the news releases, this company is a joke. I have nearly 7m shares and intend to offload them if the price ever gets to around 0.6. That's not because I don't believe in the future of this type of product, but more because the shareholders deserve more respect. If they can't respect us fo giving them our hard earned cash, they equally do not deserve our investment.

By Lucky sid ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105825&action=detail Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:50:00 GMT Lucky sid tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105794 Any views? By rbnbanks ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105794&action=detail Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:37:00 GMT rbnbanks tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105620
Does the FD really need another month to compile the figures of a year that ended over 11 weeks ago?

I think they didn't want those results out in the public domain [and the impact the continuing cash burn would have on an already battered sp] until after they have done the fund raiser.

I'd be keen to hear any other explanations for the delay because I have never,in all my years of investing,seen good news come out of delayed results.
They are what they are.they cannot be affected by anything that has happened since so there can only be one reason they are delayed and that is the company don't want anyone to see them until they have done something else.

Curious sp today though.No buying to prompt the bid moving up but some fairly weighty sells.

Maybe this is 'the support' from schroders to assist the fund raiser.

By sikovace ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105620&action=detail Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:48:00 GMT sikovace tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6105139 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6105139&action=detail Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:54:00 GMT maestr0 tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6104784 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6104784&action=detail Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:39:00 GMT nht tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6104618 -----
Considering some of the so-called news that some companies put out via RNS, I agree -- but I think there's a requirement to name the customer in an RNS and biome are clearly not able to do that. By Duck and Dive ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6104618&action=detail Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:53:00 GMT Duck and Dive tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6104315 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6104315&action=detail Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:26:00 GMT lazzadolphin tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6103924 DOH! By rbnbanks ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&display=discussion&id=6103924&action=detail Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:26:00 GMT rbnbanks