<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Stanelco PLC Discussion</title>
<description>Stanelco PLC Discussion Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion</link>





<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129574</guid>
<title>frog mat</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By c3posmate: its made of polyvinyl alchol  pvoa<br>
<br>
do your own bloody research<br>
<br>
dyobr <img src="/i/discussions/emoticons/big-grin.gif"> ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129574&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129529</guid>
<title>Re: stanelco biotec capacity statement</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: i do not know, but frog mat is based also on biodegradable plastics, so i would suggest, yes they will buy also this materials from stanelco or biotec to build frog mat. by not doing so, they would not need to have this deal made. but i am not shure about it 100 %. but this is future , until now we only have the deal but n o confirmed launch of the products. ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129529&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129518</guid>
<title>Re: stanelco biotec capacity statement</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: i will have to look that up, but it was stated , i will try tomorrow, but in the agm presentation it is also stated with the investment it is now possible to run 24/7, before it was not. ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129518&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129501</guid>
<title>Re: stanelco biotec capacity statement</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By equate: Can anyone say if MonoSol are taking Bioplast product from Biotec to produce Frogmat, which they, MonoSol hope to roll out 2nd half of 2008.<br>
<A HREF="http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200805070700428217T" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200805070700428217T')" target="_new">http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200805070700428217T</A> ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129501&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129488</guid>
<title>Re: stanelco biotec capacity statement</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By madpad: Desertwolf where did you read the current footprint/configuration was 8 hours a day?Thanks.Also any chance of spellcheck and a few capitals! ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129488&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129471</guid>
<title>New French Facility</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By madpad: Equate just spoke to Sphere &quot;communications&quot;and thay would or could not tell me if this facility was Biotec or Sphere and suggested I e-mail them.Will let you know if I get a reply. ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129471&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129466</guid>
<title>stanelco biotec capacity statement</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: you will find this in the figures of the annual report :<br>
<br>
Investment in new equipment at Biotec during the year of &pound;1.0 million increased effective capacity to 7,500 tonnes per<br>
annum. The end result is a capable and modern automated facility that, while unproven as yet by demand, may be able<br>
to flex up to 20,000 tonnes per annum in its current footprint/configuration.<br>
<br>
the current footprint/configuration was 8 hours a day, so calculate yourself if run 24/7 :-) ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129466&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129433</guid>
<title>Re: Biotec Capacity</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: dont you think they will better invest into biotec to whom by the way they sell their materials to produce bioplast, than building and controlling an own unit. there is no proof of a decision taken, please identify the facts, if so, there is only a hint that this could be planed and before they build up capacities themself with r &amp; d e.g. and have to pay royalties for it, it will be better to do it as a joint venture for them. they have no experience in this themselve and it is not their main focus to produce themselve, if so it would have been easy to buy seo at this levels and coordinate and control everything themselfe ! ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129433&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129424</guid>
<title>Re: Once again the 120,000 ton</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: paul mines is binded to what he is saying and he is not positive in his comments, which is apprechiated very much, better than promising figures which will not be delivered. its not stated that this is on a 24/7 base. it is under cirrent modification the volumes mentioned to be reached and the configuration as when he stated this was 8 hours a day ! ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129424&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129420</guid>
<title>the figures</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: the most important is how the balance sheet will look like, if we calculate on the base what was presented towards the agm, we can calculate of a turnover of approx. between 9.8 million and 11 million. with no mageur write downs, the question is, will we be profitable ? also this is conservative figures only build of the increase in biotec, without rf business and licence agrrements on extra volume. we will know more after the august update, but we are quite closely to beeing even or a very slight profit in 2008 i believe. correct me if i am wrong :-) ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129420&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129419</guid>
<title>Re: Biotec Capacity</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By FLASH GARDEN: wolfman,<br>
appreciate your comments.<br>
Agreed Biotec and therefore SEO will benefit in a small way from property rights if SPhere produce Bioplast at their own facility.<br>
But the decision whether they can or cannot do this has already been made.<br>
It is simple.<br>
If Biotec as a company cannot meet SPhere's demand then they are allowed to produce bioplast themselves, end of story.<br>
There are many ways of looking at it.<br>
SEO could be quickly increasing their customer base and restricting SPhere supply as they have golden share rights.....not likely IMO.<br>
or it could be that the SPhere representatives at Biotec are blocking a decision to expand the plant in germany because they would prefer to produce bioplast themselves....thats what I would do!!<br>
My take is that the decision made by SPhere has fundamental implications<br>
for the SEO share price and is based on an agreement entered into by SEO themselves so clarification is needed from SEO to its shareholders.<br>
flash<br>
 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129419&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129417</guid>
<title>Once again the 120,000 ton</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By LordOfEssex: Paul Mines himeself said that 12,000 - 20,000 mt was capacity @ 24/7 but this had not been tested.<br>
<br>
As for sphere going alone, they would still have to pay Biotec royalties for the Bioplast formular.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129417&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129376</guid>
<title>Re: Biotec Capacity</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: sphere was planing a production facility, it was not builded as of yet and there will be some cooperation on this with biotec, as they have the patent for it, so they can not just build themself und start production. if something like this happens, be shure there will be a kind of cooperation for this with biotec and if this is the case automatically with seo. between planing and doing there is a great step in between. finally we are just guessing what the output of biotec is and as stated before it will be between 36000 and 120000, so we have to await the update in august, which will show clear figures and updates. besides sphere has enough work to convert there consumption of 120000 to biotec which is also not done within one day ! cheers ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129376&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129375</guid>
<title>Re: Biotec Capacity</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By desertwolf01: sphere was planing a production facility, it was not buided as of yet and there will be some cooperation on this with biotec, as they have the patent for it, so they can not just build themself und start production. if something like this happens, be shure there will be a kind of cooperation for this with biotec and if this is the case automatically with seo. between planing and doing there is a great step in between. finally we are just guessing what the output of biotec is and as stated before it will be between 36000 and 120000, so we have to await the update in august, which will show clear figures and updates. besides sphere has enough work to convert there consumption of 120000 to biotec which is also not done within one day ! cheers ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129375&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4129363</guid>
<title>Re: Biotec Capacity</title>
<description><![CDATA[ By FLASH GARDEN: nice link equate.<br>
so its happened.<br>
Biotec cannot meet demand so sphere are going to produce bioplast themselves to meet their own requirements.<br>
IMO SEO should now tell us what the production figures are for Biotec and why they are not planning a plant expansion at Biotec.<br>
It affects the share price.<br>
It should be released.<br>
<br>
flash ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:SEO.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=4129363&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
