<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Tanfield </title>
<description>Tanfield Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion</link>



<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10660308</guid>
<title>News</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Well where are the finals re 2012, this is going to the wire AGAIN as they have to be filed by the end of June. <br>
SP being walked up here, for what reason though?  Can't see one myself and as soon as results are out I believe it will fall back significantly. On the other hand if they have a buyer lined up for snorkel that could help, but at what price. No news whatsoever for weeks on that front doesn't look good, and rumours of lay offs at the vigo centre.<br>
Now some eejit on another board is starting to suggest that Smith may well float on AIM, you couldn't make this up could you really, how would that work then. Basically an american Co using AIM and UK investors cash to float in the UK when they couldn't summen up enough interest nearly 12 months ago in the states. AS far as I'm concerned that is all total fantasy anw will never happen. Best Smith can hope for is a further attempt to float in the states but they need to sort themselves out financially before that can happen.<br>
<br>
 By Soolaimon ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10660308&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Soolaimon</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10647019</guid>
<title>Re: RNS (probable)</title>
<description><![CDATA[ That's the best laugh I have had in ages..<br>
<br>
The sad part is that it will be so close to the truth By Drewton ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10647019&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 05:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Drewton</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10642349</guid>
<title>Re: Sp</title>
<description><![CDATA[ See your back,yes somthing seems to be happening here,dont know what but could be the sale of snorkel,i sold out here a whille ago have been tempted to get back in but hanvnt,im still in with OPTARE, which has fell sharply but orders have been rolloing in and the SP has just started to rise,could be a punt for you.<br>
<br>
As for Johnga dont think havnt seen any posts anywhere <br>
<br>
<br>
 By pedrobob3 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10642349&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 06:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pedrobob3</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10641505</guid>
<title>Sp</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Looks like this has risen from the dead, anyone heard anything to suggest why this rise? <br>
<br>
Talk of another attempt at an IPO by Smith on another board, can't see that myself, the last one took an eternity to arrange and then flopped. We have heard nothing to suggest Smith is moving towards profitability or orders are on the increase. Sale of Snorkel imminent? <br>
<br>
Results should be out this month, but they will be dire so the sp will drop when those hit, in the meantime we are seeing a slow and steady rise!! I wonder why?<br>
<br>
J must be trading this, although seems to have left the planet.<br>
<br>
Sool By Soolaimon ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10641505&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Soolaimon</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10587013</guid>
<title>Re: RNS (probable)</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Perfectly composed, thats made me smile!<br>
The disturbing thing is, if it were real many Tanfield investors would just have to lump it as there's clearly no regulation of these joker directors. By tomtastic ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10587013&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 08:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tomtastic</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10586678</guid>
<title>RNS (probable)</title>
<description><![CDATA[ The Board of Tanfield are pleased to announce that following an exhaustive M&amp;A schedule, a buyer for the Snorkel Powered Access Division (Snorkel) has been found. The buyer is RSDKJP Enterprises Ltd (named after the main shareholders in this new organisation Stanley, Kell, Pither)  <br>
<br>
We are pleased to confirm that a total sum payable to the Tanfield Group is &pound;1. The sale of Snorkel is debt free and includes Tanfields last few pounds of cash. Net after M&amp;A fees Tanfield will report an exceptional loss on this transaction of &pound;1.5m. <br>
<br>
Darren Kell of Tanfield stated &quot;We are extremely pleased for the shareholders of Tanfield group that after 4 years of complete mismanagement we have been able to get anything for the Snorkel brand and we therefore see that &pound;1, in this economic climate, as a real result&quot;<br>
<br>
Darren Kell of RSDKJP Enterprises Ltd stated &quot;We are delighted that we have been able to engineer a purchase of the Snorkel brand, debt free, with some cash in the bank, and now the Tanfield shareholders have had their value completely destroyed, the directors of this RDKJP can continue to enjoy the life or Riley&quot; By valueinvestormike ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10586678&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 07:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>valueinvestormike</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10581138</guid>
<title>Re: 2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ TW <br>
Soolaimon thinks he's johnga and knicol46 still posting after telling everyone to sell......you have to laugh! <br>
Very droll TW, yes correct I have sold out here, but that doesn't stop me looking in now and then, waiting to see what mess they are in, all I'm afraid down to mismanagement by the bod. Your not still invested here are you? if you are then good luck.<br>
<br>
Sool By Soolaimon ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10581138&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Soolaimon</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10579704</guid>
<title>Re: 2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Soolaimon thinks he's johnga and knicol46 still posting after telling everyone to sell......you have to laugh! By Totally Wired ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10579704&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Totally Wired</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10579601</guid>
<title>Re: 2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Managed to get to speak to someone at Tanfield who say that even though the Tanfield website states end of April 2013 for the preliminary 2012 results, they will actually be released sometime in May or possibly even June but definitely before the 1 July.<br>
<br>
The annual report is apparently due at around the same time. By knicol46 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10579601&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>knicol46</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10575441</guid>
<title>Re: 2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ They did only say they expected to release their results in April, but they didn't say which year!!!!!! mind they have to be filed by end of June so they must of meant 2013.<br>
I think they are probably taking a well earned breather, like the one they took before xmas. This will ensure that production can recommence full steam ahead once again leading to mammoth losses.<br>
I think we already know what the results are in any case, shiiiiiiiiiiiiite. Kell is probanly negotiating his bonus as we speak, I think if the losses increase so does his bonus, at bit like those bankers in the state owned banks. Luvvly jubbly!!! By Soolaimon ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10575441&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Soolaimon</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10575002</guid>
<title>Re: 2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ their not even answering their phones By knicol46 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10575002&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>knicol46</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10574998</guid>
<title>2012 results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Tanfield were due to release their 2012 prelim results by the 30 April 2013.<br>
<br>
I have emailed Tanfield and even they do not seem to know.  Some business setup they have here.<br>
 By knicol46 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10574998&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>knicol46</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10532634</guid>
<title>Sale of Snorkel ??</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <br>
15th April 2013.maybe accounts for the rise today<br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.vertikal.net/en/news/story/17094/" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.vertikal.net/en/news/story/17094/')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.vertikal.net/en/news/story/17094/</A> By pedrobob3 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10532634&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pedrobob3</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10495831</guid>
<title>Smith Chasing funds in Monaco!</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Smith has been pitching for investors recently in Monaco:<br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.cleanequitymonaco.com/_uploads/downloads/CleanEquity%20Monaco%202013%20Programme.pdf" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.cleanequitymonaco.com/_uploads/downloads/CleanEquity%20Monaco%202013%20Programme.pdf<br>')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cleanequitymonaco.com/_uploads/downloads/CleanEquity%20Monaco%202013%20Programme.pdf<br></A>
<br>
<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cleanequity-monaco-2013-companies-collaborations-144400127.html" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cleanequity-monaco-2013-companies-collaborations-144400127.html<br>')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cleanequity-monaco-2013-companies-collaborations-144400127.html<br></A>
<br>
 By drumster ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10495831&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>drumster</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10490672</guid>
<title>Re: Trying to work out what they are up to</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Mike<br>
Almost certainly the reason that Tanfield didn't insist on the loan being repaid is because Smith don't have the cash. They would not push it because certain members of the bod are tied up in both, a loan between mates if you will!!!<br>
&Acirc;&pound;10m eh I don't know about that, for me it is only the Kansas plant that has any value or pull for predators, but who is going to buy it???<br>
Finally I can't for the life of me see a special payment being made to holders now, not in a million.<br>
I agree Tan will be a small engineering company, turnover &Acirc;&pound;4M, with cash and a stake in Smith. Not very appealing I have to say.<br>
<br>
Sool By Soolaimon ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:TAN.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10490672&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Soolaimon</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
