<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Xcite Energy </title>
<description>Xcite Energy Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion</link>



<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611761</guid>
<title>whats up eejit2010</title>
<description><![CDATA[ you and your others given up attacking the geology and engineering , of Bentley now that you have all been totally discredited on these fronts.<br>
Results of splendid EWT  and upgrade announcement totally wiped the floor with your little party did it not PMSL.<br>
BoD  doing a first class job here . forget the PR BS what`s the point , usual crew sit back wait for the momentum generated by RNS`s to die off then short the backside off it ,  been happening for months .<br>
Fundamentals that grow better by the day as more and more data is analysed will be the death of these clowns, it will be like a bolt out of the blue and not too far off when it happens ,far too many big guns interested in this and someone will make a move very soon , forget 2016 we will be swallowed up long before that.<br>
Sit tight hold on to your paper it`s worth a lot of money.<br>
<br>
XEL best buy on AIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! By upanchors ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611761&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>upanchors</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611710</guid>
<title>Re: Divergence anyone</title>
<description><![CDATA[ try again<br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen%20Shot%202013-05-19%20at%2008.45.28.png" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen%20Shot%202013-05-19%20at%2008.45.28.png')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen%20Shot%202013-05-19%20at%2008.45.28.png</A> By twl2009 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611710&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>twl2009</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611676</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Ok - thanks.<br>
Not sure the update's worth much!<br>
A couple of hedge funds keeping their heads down, I suspect. By Cantseethewoodsforthetrees ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611676&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Cantseethewoodsforthetrees</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611672</guid>
<title>Divergence anyone</title>
<description><![CDATA[ <A HREF="http://www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen...%20at%2008.45.28.png" onclick="return redirectcheck('startwww://www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen...%20at%2008.45.28.png')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">www.dropbox.com/s/7vgbvnrsev4j2qv/Screen...%20at%2008.45.28.png</A> By twl2009 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611672&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>twl2009</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611646</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Have another look. the 17th May version is up again. I think they've just updated their pr computer to a 1990 Amstrad model, hence the fiasco. It might explain the excellent pr over the past two years. By frankobe ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611646&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>frankobe</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611645</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Cantsee<br>
<br>
I had that problem! (it has been updated though)<br>
<br>
Something to do with the cache I believe.<br>
<br>
ATB<br>
 By chappi10 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611645&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chappi10</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611635</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Not updated, as far as I can see:<br>
<A HREF="http://www.xcite-energy.com/investors/shareholding-analysis" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.xcite-energy.com/investors/shareholding-analysis')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.xcite-energy.com/investors/shareholding-analysis</A> By Cantseethewoodsforthetrees ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611635&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Cantseethewoodsforthetrees</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611552</guid>
<title>Re: Valuing Xcite</title>
<description><![CDATA[ It is not that the directors can't do anything about the price. They just don't think the most productive use of their time is to go gallivanting on roadshows to PIs just to get the price to 110p or 125p or whatever. Then what? To get the derampers of this world trying to get it back to below a pound just because there hasn't been news for a few short while.<br>
<br>
Much better idea is to focus on getting the more pressing work done and we all know what that is. Share price at 90 or 95 or 120, frankly not much difference to me. Don't lose sight of the bigger picture.<br>
<br>
GLA,<br>
<br>
HR By HRGGIBBON ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611552&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>HRGGIBBON</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611486</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Yes thats maybe the case Eric and I was told they did not know of the Global sale as it happened but were told via the right channels a few days later and correctly issued an rns .I would though want to find out where those shares went if it was me and such a large chunk of the shares had been sold.They were done so to avoid the threshold coming into play so the buyer wanted to keep it secret that is obvious. Surely by obtaining or looking at the share register they can find out ? Maybe if they did go to Scap or Socius it was a relief rather than a hostile potential bidder. By pinkisback ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611486&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pinkisback</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611466</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ About holdings above 3% that have to be reported;<br>
Cole stated on the AGM that in principle conpanies have to play the game that way, but not all the conpanies play the game that way.<br>
He wasn't giving us a hint with that iko, but he was saying with it that they are not alsays aware of who is holding more than x percent. By EricBal ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611466&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>EricBal</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611464</guid>
<title>Re: Zero, your chance to &amp;quot;keep it real&amp;quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[ So your valuation of the potential target price is utter tosh.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
No.<br>
<br>
They are my own target prices, therefore not utter tosh.<br>
<br>
You may have a different target price, whatever that may be - good luck, it's a gamblers market so realistic targets are more attractive to me than the over hyped tosh that gets frequently posted on here..<br>
<br>
 By Zero to infinitea ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611464&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Zero to infinitea</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611401</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Well, Pink is Back, I spotted it had been updated last night and posted at 22:22 last night on this. I think some browsers default to a cached version where possible. You can go into Options and empty your cache regularly, or if you open such a page, press Ctr R to reload to make sure you are getting the latest version. We don't really know who owns these share - it is possible - within the bounds of possibility that 19m shares have been obtained in 3 lots and held by proxy companies so they are all under the reporting limit - but in the end, that is just guesswork. The pattern of trading in late 2012 showed that SCAP had plenty of shares. It is possible that a combination of these things is at play - eg just under 3% to an II, and the remainder to SCAP for their own purposes. We will never know for sure - but what we do know is that Rupert has said that newsflow is months away here and he will not attempt to improve PR. By investor2010 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611401&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>investor2010</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611372</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Pink, yes I knew we where due an update (6 monthly)...........someone must be doing some overtime this morning<img src="/sites/all/themes/iii2010/iiicentre/discussions/emoticons/smile.gif"> By chappi10 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611372&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>chappi10</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611369</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ chappi i2010 is correct it has been updated to 17/5 just in the last few hours.It hadn't earlier this morning ? Someone working Sundays !!!!! By pinkisback ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611369&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pinkisback</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10611364</guid>
<title>Re: shareholding analysis updated</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Investor I checked this morning and it hadn't been updated now it has ! I have never said these had been sold to an oil company in fact I was pretty sure they hadn't OFFICIALLY .You are maybe right about Scap but they may also have been taken up by Socius and my theory was that they could have got rid between 20th Nov and now but retained their holding so knowone was the wiser and taken a fee from Global .The price in those transactions of 95p was exactly the price the Socius deal was done at and a coincidence ? Global couldn't have sold on the open market themselves as it would have crashed the price.Rupert said at the AGM I believe that Global and Socius weren't hostile so maybe Global having been told they weren't going to be called upon again simply took the decision to sell up and wait for thr big pay day like us all in respect of the warrants .These have in effect already been purchased as the price is fixed and they have 2 years left to take up . Strange also that just before this update volume fell off until the AGM so have they all now been disposed of ? We will see this week what the trend is but the sooner this comes to an end and the shares have a chance to behave naturally then the better chance we have of a rise and maybe a few institutions getting involved . By pinkisback ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XEL.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10611364&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pinkisback</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
