<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/i/xml/xsl_formatting_rss.xml"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>STM Group </title>
<description>STM Group Board</description>
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion</link>



<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.10412043</guid>
<title>Annual Results ....</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ... are due early next month. I think STM will have turned a corner and the results are likely to show a big improvement based mainly on QROP sales in Gibraltar and Malta.  These are now two of the most favoured locations for QROPs and STM is represented in both. By dandigirl ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=10412043&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dandigirl</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.9516540</guid>
<title>Unaudited Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Why are salaries up almost &pound;1m after relatively constant numbers and yet social insurance is lower, indicating fewer employees. The final accounts will be an interesting read. By rockmole ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=9516540&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rockmole</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.8865696</guid>
<title>Re: Interim Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ My view is that there is too much padding both sides of the balance sheet. Who do they think they are kidding? By dandigirl ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=8865696&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dandigirl</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.8714725</guid>
<title>Interim Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[ 6 month trading update seems late; it was issued on 30th July last year. Any views? By rockmole ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=8714725&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rockmole</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.7667392</guid>
<title>Share Price Rise</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Anybody have a clue to the reasons behind the kick up in the share price in the last couple of weeks? A trading statement is due this month. Maybe some people know it's going to be good? By dandigirl ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=7667392&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dandigirl</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6199091</guid>
<title>Re: acquisition and incentives</title>
<description><![CDATA[ They arent sells. You can buy for 23.4p<br>
<br>
trades are almost non existent but theres only been 2 sells in the last 2 weeks By hithere1andall ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6199091&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hithere1andall</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6198332</guid>
<title>Re: acquisition and incentives</title>
<description><![CDATA[ so why then are all the trades since the results &quot;sells&quot;? Something isnt right. By Jeffers51 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6198332&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jeffers51</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6194549</guid>
<title>Re: acquisition and incentives</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I agree its a tall order and find it hard to see them reaching all targets but even if they reach half, its worth double the share price.<br>
<br>
<br>
I dont see the deal being a bargain but on the other hand I dont see it being overly expensive either as it fits well with there plans. I like the fact they are now going to concentrate on existing businesses for 2010 and not chase any more acquisitions. <br>
Hopefully it will not be costly to bed in as others have proven to be, and the separate divisions can pull together more which seems to have been a problem in the past......a nice incentive package always helps to smooth these problems.<br>
<br>
<br>
Evolution seems to have reiterated there stance with a 35p target and I believe Finncap have a new report out next week.<br>
<br>
<br>
1st hurdle is eps of 3p+ for 2010 which looks definitely achievable and 4.3p+ for 2011 which looks tighter....at 35p that would put it on a 2011 p/e of  8 which seems reasonable. By hithere1andall ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6194549&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hithere1andall</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6193962</guid>
<title>Re: acquisition and incentives</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I see your point. Agree on incentives but looks like a tall order. That said if it works then the share price will have moved 5 times in the next 3 years - not a bad return.....but....<br>
<br>
Re the acquisition it will be earnings enhancing as it is bought as a going concern. But they pay &pound;5.1M for profits of &pound;0.6M when trading themselves on a PE of 3.6. Looks expensive IMO. This may explain the price weakening seen.<br>
<br>
The reports for 2008 and 2009 dont match up. the life company was launched in Spring 2008 but seems to be new for 2009. The general feeling is that the life bond market is well up due to concerns on bank disclosures so that's business not being captured. By Jeffers51 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6193962&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jeffers51</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6187933</guid>
<title>acquisition and incentives</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Some good things going on here in the last few days.<br>
Acquisition should be earnings enhancing this year but Ive especially interested in the incentive plan thats being rolled out for key members of staff. <br>
<br>
Anywhere that has such large reward for share price and eps targets always appeal to human greed, so it wouldnt surprise me if the targets are met this year at least. It should also retain the management and make sure they work there arse off to try and achieve it. By hithere1andall ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6187933&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hithere1andall</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.6067105</guid>
<title>Results for 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Just picked these up. Seems that key indicators moving the wrong way. Cash collection seems an issue meaning that if only 1/3rd of the very overdue customers were not to pay there would be serious losses. Compared with other businesses with flows of annuity income the p/e seems weak so I am struggling with the business model.<br>
<br>
I note Altas (<A HREF="http://www.atlas-corp.com/" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.atlas-corp.com/')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlas-corp.com/</A>) is a company in a similar industry looking to float on AIM and this would be good to see the comparisions which are otherwise difficult to make. <br>
<br>
Still on the watchlist...just. By Jeffers51 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=6067105&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jeffers51</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5557512</guid>
<title>Over/under-valued?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I have this on my watchlist. Looking towards full year results before taking any further. But not much information out there. I see broker comments but since then the share has reversed. Would appreciate any new sources. By Jeffers51 ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5557512&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jeffers51</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5067733</guid>
<title>Director Dealing</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Two purchases of &pound;3,500 each by the main shareholder doesnt exactly inspire confidence. Looks like they are trying to create some activity in the shares to try and stop the price weakening. By Business King ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5067733&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Business King</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5041701</guid>
<title>Re: Trading Update -just passing by.</title>
<description><![CDATA[ I see that Evolution is recommending a buy with a target of 60p, see:<br>
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.intermarketstocks.com/imsmembers/imsrecdetails.php?id=53584" onclick="return redirectcheck('http://www.intermarketstocks.com/imsmembers/imsrecdetails.php?id=53584<br>')" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.intermarketstocks.com/imsmembers/imsrecdetails.php?id=53584<br></A>
<br>
I remain to be convinced. The trading statment looks speculative on their abiity to recover budgets for  the 2nd half of the year based on, yet more, internal &quot;improvements&quot;. By Business King ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5041701&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Business King</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.5039859</guid>
<title>Re: Trading Update -just passing by.</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the various comments about STM on this board.<br>
<br>
The share caught my eye via today's Broker &quot;Buy&quot; recommendation from Dan Stewart, with a new target price of 50p, against their previous 85p target.<br>
<br>
I notice the house broker, Evolution, 1/4/09, had no recommendation on the shares.<br>
<br>
I think you're correct that it's a speculative buy at quite a bit lower price and I'll keep STM on my watch list.<br>
<br>
m By mantrova ]]></description> 
<link>http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:STM.L&amp;display=discussion&amp;id=5039859&amp;action=detail</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mantrova</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
