xG Technology Inc Discussion Board http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion http://www.iii.co.uk/icons/logos/uk_logo.gif http://www.iii.co.uk tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4149345
Given that the current spread is $5.0-$6.0, if what you say is correct, it seems strange that all the transactions for the last week have been close to the offer, between $5.0 and $5.25. To me, those trades look like the market-makers taking in shares from a seller.

If there was a buyer in the market, wouldn't the market-makers then be looking to make money on the spread, and sell them on at closer to the $6 mark?

The last trade above the midprice was 1000 shares @ 5.75 on the 25th July, and before that 150 shares on the 17th July.

I guess one possibility is that one of the MM's is buying shares for their own book. Another possibility I guess is that the "real" spread could be just 5.0-5.25, but I can't see why they'd list the offer @ 6.0 if that was the case - it's pretty rare to be selling that far down in the spread - MMs aren't known to leave money on the table.

On the other hand, the 5.0 bid price has been static for weeks.

Any thoughts? ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4149345&action=detail Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:45:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4148920
There is a serious buyer for every share that is being sold. This speaks volumes for the upside of this company.

There is no other explanation, however we will look for the anti-xG ers to try to spin a negative on this.

But, The truth is in the pudding and no matter what the fact remains that there is a very serious buyer wanting to gobble up all they can.

Happy Days for everyone long !

Cheers !

]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4148920&action=detail Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:49:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4148183 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4148183&action=detail Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:56:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4147570 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4147570&action=detail Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:02:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4147509
RF Design Engineer
Sunrise, FL
Florida-based wireless telecommunications company seeks an RF Design Engineer to participate in the launch of the nation's first mobile VoIP wireless service. Candidates should be willing to work in a demanding, yet cutting-edge and exciting tech environment. Opportunity to join premier multi-national technical team responsible for industry changing technology development. Immediate opening, full benefits offered. The ideal RF Design Engineer (MSEE) will have 7-8 years of component/board level design experience. 3+ years experience in high efficiency, high power amplifier designs. The successful candidate will have broad experience in the design, development and testing (including regulatory testing) of RF electronics hardware designs including RF distribution, frequency conversion, high power... ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4147509&action=detail Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:38:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4144601
That filing also suggests that their much-boasted original modulation method is not capable of delivering the data rates they were(are?) promising. If that is not true, then why are they adding a second modulation to their signal? It could just be another flight of Bobier's fancy, not intended for immediate use. But, given their project slippage, why are they playing with this, if not to overcome a pressing problem? ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4144601&action=detail Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:53:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4144144
http://www.careerbuilder.com/JobSeeker/Jobs/JobDetails.aspx?sc_extcmp=JS_JobAlert_Title&ipath=PSSKGT1&psa=1&Job_DID=J8E3L15ZL3GX27Q9V2M

How would xG even think that they could meet their September deadline for a production ready basestation when they don't even have a suitable replacement for their lead RF engineer?

]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4144144&action=detail Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:49:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4140861 ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4140861&action=detail Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:30:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4140857 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4140857&action=detail Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:27:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4140720 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4140720&action=detail Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:15:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4128236
Well yes it would seem that someone is building a position by picking up XG shares in blocks of 15000... ]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4128236&action=detail Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:15:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4128225 one minute apart.

Time/Date Price Volume Trade value Type
16:20:26 22-Jul-2008 5.05 15,000 75,750.00 Ordinary Trade
16:19:25 22-Jul-2008 5.00 15,000 75,000.00 Ordinary Trade

]]> http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4128225&action=detail Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:09:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4124533 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4124533&action=detail Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:17:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4124157 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4124157&action=detail Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:57:00 GMT tag:iii.co.uk,2003:tst.4124094 http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail?code=cotn:XGT.L&display=discussion&id=4124094&action=detail Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:55:00 GMT